These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24944106)

  • 1. Tactile spatial negative priming occurs without feature mismatch.
    Frings C; Mast F; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2305-14. PubMed ID: 24944106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial negative priming: In touch, it's all about location.
    Wesslein AK; Spence C; Mast F; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):464-73. PubMed ID: 26590049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identity-Based Crossmodal Negative Priming: Aftereffects of Ignoring in One Sensory Modality on Responding to Another Sensory Modality.
    Wesslein AK; Frings C
    Multisens Res; 2020 Aug; 33(7):703-721. PubMed ID: 32101789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Numerical Priming Between Touch and Vision Depends on Tactile Discrimination.
    Faivre N; Salomon R; Vuillaume L; Blanke O
    Perception; 2016; 45(1-2):114-24. PubMed ID: 26562854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The time-course of distractor processing in auditory spatial negative priming.
    Möller M; Mayr S; Buchner A
    Psychol Res; 2016 Sep; 80(5):744-56. PubMed ID: 26233234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial remapping in the audio-tactile ventriloquism effect: a TMS investigation on the role of the ventral intraparietal area.
    Renzi C; Bruns P; Heise KF; Zimerman M; Feldheim JF; Hummel FC; Röder B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 May; 25(5):790-801. PubMed ID: 23363411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When seeing doesn't matter: assessing the after-effects of tactile distractor processing in the blind and the sighted.
    Frings C; Amendt A; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1174-81. PubMed ID: 21553991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial negative priming: Location or response?
    Neill WT; Kleinsmith AL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2411-2419. PubMed ID: 27465862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial specificity of tactile enhancement during reaching.
    Voudouris D; Fiehler K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Nov; 79(8):2424-2434. PubMed ID: 28741099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flexibly weighted integration of tactile reference frames.
    Badde S; Röder B; Heed T
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():367-74. PubMed ID: 25447059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial patterns in tactile perception: is there a tactile field?
    Haggard P; Giovagnoli G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 21470584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual-somatotopic interactions in spatial perception.
    Samad M; Shams L
    Neuroreport; 2016 Feb; 27(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 26709693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences between endogenous attention to spatial locations and sensory modalities.
    Vibell J; Klinge C; Zampini M; Nobre AC; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Oct; 235(10):2983-2996. PubMed ID: 28717820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost of Dual-Task Performance in Tactile Perception Is Greater for Competing Tasks of the Same Type.
    Nguyen D; Brown J; Alais D
    Perception; 2020 May; 49(5):515-538. PubMed ID: 32216523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tactile temporal processing in the auditory cortex.
    Bolognini N; Papagno C; Moroni D; Maravita A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1201-11. PubMed ID: 19413471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of spatial response coding on distractor processing: evidence from auditory spatial negative priming tasks with keypress, joystick, and head movement responses.
    Möller M; Mayr S; Buchner A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):293-310. PubMed ID: 25214304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An attentional-adaptation account of spatial negative priming: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Liu XL; Walsh MM; Reder LM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 14(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 24464637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tactile capture of auditory localization is modulated by hand posture.
    Bruns P; Röder B
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(4):267-74. PubMed ID: 20178933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gestalt grouping effects on tactile information processing: when touching hands override spatial proximity.
    Frings C; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Apr; 75(3):468-80. PubMed ID: 23307427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.