These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24944106)

  • 21. An attentional-adaptation account of spatial negative priming: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Liu XL; Walsh MM; Reder LM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 14(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 24464637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Altered auditory-tactile interactions in congenitally blind humans: an event-related potential study.
    Hötting K; Rösler F; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 159(3):370-81. PubMed ID: 15241575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Testing the perceptual equivalence hypothesis in mental rotation of 3D stimuli with visual and tactile input.
    Caissie AF; Dwarakanath A; Toussaint L
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Mar; 236(3):881-896. PubMed ID: 29356865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Target localization among concurrent sound sources: no evidence for the inhibition of previous distractor responses.
    Möller M; Mayr S; Buchner A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jan; 75(1):132-44. PubMed ID: 23077027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The breakdown of the Simon effect in cross-modal contexts: EEG evidence.
    Castro L; Soto-Faraco S; Morís Fernández L; Ruzzoli M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 47(7):832-844. PubMed ID: 29495127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Masked stimuli modulate endogenous shifts of spatial attention.
    Palmer S; Mattler U
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Jun; 22(2):486-503. PubMed ID: 23528730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contextual modulation of prime response retrieval processes: Evidence from auditory negative priming.
    Mayr S; Möller M; Buchner A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):1918-1931. PubMed ID: 30094603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Voluntary movement affects simultaneous perception of auditory and tactile stimuli presented to a non-moving body part.
    Hao Q; Ora H; Ogawa K; Ogata T; Miyake Y
    Sci Rep; 2016 Sep; 6():33336. PubMed ID: 27622584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Flanker negative priming from spatially unpredictable primes: an ERP study.
    Gibbons H; Frings C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 20079389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Event-related potential evidence for a dynamic (re-)weighting of somatotopic and external coordinates of touch during visual-tactile interactions.
    Ley P; Steinberg U; Hanganu-Opatz IL; Röder B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 May; 41(11):1466-74. PubMed ID: 25879770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Spatial imagery relies on a sensory independent, though sensory sensitive, functional organization within the parietal cortex: a fMRI study of angle discrimination in sighted and congenitally blind individuals.
    Bonino D; Ricciardi E; Bernardi G; Sani L; Gentili C; Vecchi T; Pietrini P
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Feb; 68():59-70. PubMed ID: 25575449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Seeing and feeling for self and other: proprioceptive spatial location determines multisensory enhancement of touch.
    Cardini F; Haggard P; Ladavas E
    Cognition; 2013 Apr; 127(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 23376293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Tactile perception during action observation.
    Vastano R; Inuggi A; Vargas CD; Baud-Bovy G; Jacono M; Pozzo T
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2585-94. PubMed ID: 27161552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The contradictory influence of velocity: representational momentum in the tactile modality.
    Merz S; Deller J; Meyerhoff HS; Spence C; Frings C
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Jun; 121(6):2358-2363. PubMed ID: 30969895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Related but different: Examining pseudoneglect in audition, touch and vision.
    Eardley AF; Darling S; Dumper P; Browne D; Van Velzen J
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Apr; 113():164-171. PubMed ID: 28242465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Modality-switching in the Simon task: The clash of reference frames.
    Ruzzoli M; Soto-Faraco S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Oct; 146(10):1478-1497. PubMed ID: 28639796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cue-locked lateralized components in a tactile spatial attention task: Evidence for a functional dissociation between ADAN and LSN.
    Gherri E; Gooray E; Forster B
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Apr; 53(4):507-17. PubMed ID: 26695445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. To what extent do Gestalt grouping principles influence tactile perception?
    Gallace A; Spence C
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jul; 137(4):538-61. PubMed ID: 21574680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Poorer resolution for audiotactile than for audiovisual synchrony detection in cluttered displays.
    Orchard-Mills E; Van der Burg E; Alais D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):953-64. PubMed ID: 26766511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multiple foci of spatial attention in multimodal working memory.
    Katus T; Eimer M
    Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 142():583-589. PubMed ID: 27544450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.