210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24944150)
1. Manubrium-limited sternotomy decreases blood loss after aortic valve replacement surgery.
Burdett CL; Lage IB; Goodwin AT; White RW; Khan KJ; Owens WA; Kendall SW; Ferguson JI; Dunning J; Akowuah EF
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2014 Oct; 19(4):605-10. PubMed ID: 24944150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Manubrium-limited ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement (MAVRIC): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Akowuah E; Goodwin AT; Owens WA; Hancock HC; Maier R; Kasim A; Mellor A; Khan K; Murphy G; Mason J
Trials; 2017 Jan; 18(1):46. PubMed ID: 28129780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with a mini upper sternotomy.
Chien S; Clark C; Maheshwari S; Koutsogiannidis CP; Zamvar V; Giordano V; Lim K; Pessotto R
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Aug; 15(1):226. PubMed ID: 32847577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement provides equivalent outcomes at reduced cost compared with conventional aortic valve replacement: A real-world multi-institutional analysis.
Ghanta RK; Lapar DJ; Kern JA; Kron IL; Speir AM; Fonner E; Quader M; Ailawadi G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1060-5. PubMed ID: 25680751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.
Kirmani BH; Jones SG; Malaisrie SC; Chung DA; Williams RJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 4(4):CD011793. PubMed ID: 28394022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Full sternotomy and minimal access approaches for surgical aortic valve replacement: a multicentre propensity-matched study.
Paparella D; Malvindi PG; Santarpino G; Moscarelli M; Guida P; Fattouch K; Margari V; Martinelli L; Albertini A; Speziale G
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Apr; 57(4):709-716. PubMed ID: 31647535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of aortic valve replacement via partial upper sternotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement in obese patients.
Welp HA; Herlemann I; Martens S; Deschka H
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Oct; 27(4):481-486. PubMed ID: 29617839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.
Gilmanov D; Farneti PA; Ferrarini M; Santarelli F; Murzi M; Miceli A; Solinas M; Glauber M
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):732-41; discussion 741. PubMed ID: 25757476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term outcomes of mini-sternotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a randomized controlled trial.
Telyuk P; Hancock H; Maier R; Batty JA; Goodwin A; Owens WA; Ogundimu E; Akowuah E
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 Dec; 63(1):. PubMed ID: 36394261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: matched propensity score analysis of 808 patients.
Furukawa N; Kuss O; Aboud A; Schönbrodt M; Renner A; Hakim Meibodi K; Becker T; Zittermann A; Gummert JF; Börgermann J
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Aug; 46(2):221-6; discussion 226-7. PubMed ID: 24446478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis.
Gilmanov D; Bevilacqua S; Murzi M; Cerillo AG; Gasbarri T; Kallushi E; Miceli A; Glauber M
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Sep; 96(3):837-43. PubMed ID: 23866805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do obese patients benefit from isolated aortic valve replacement through a partial upper sternotomy?
Xie XB; Dai XF; Qiu ZH; Jiang DB; Wu QS; Dong Y; Chen LW
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 Aug; 17(1):179. PubMed ID: 35922828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mini-Stern Trial: A randomized trial comparing mini-sternotomy to full median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.
Nair SK; Sudarshan CD; Thorpe BS; Singh J; Pillay T; Catarino P; Valchanov K; Codispoti M; Dunning J; Abu-Omar Y; Moorjani N; Matthews C; Freeman CJ; Fox-Rushby JA; Sharples LD
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Dec; 156(6):2124-2132.e31. PubMed ID: 30075959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis.
Dalén M; Biancari F; Rubino AS; Santarpino G; Glaser N; De Praetere H; Kasama K; Juvonen T; Deste W; Pollari F; Meuris B; Fischlein T; Mignosa C; Gatti G; Pappalardo A; Svenarud P; Sartipy U
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 49(1):220-7. PubMed ID: 25653252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Ministernotomy Versus Minithoracotomy Approach.
Hassan M; Miao Y; Maraey A; Lincoln J; Brown S; Windsor J; Ricci M
J Heart Valve Dis; 2015 Sep; 24(5):531-9. PubMed ID: 26897831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive versus transapical versus transfemoral aortic valve implantation: A one-to-one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis.
Furukawa N; Kuss O; Emmel E; Scholtz S; Scholtz W; Fujita B; Ensminger S; Gummert JF; Börgermann J
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Nov; 156(5):1825-1834. PubMed ID: 29861110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cerebral microemboli in mini-sternotomy compared to mini- thoracotomy for aortic valve replacement: a cross sectional cohort study.
Bozhinovska M; Jenko M; Stupica GT; Klokočovnik T; Kšela J; Jelenc M; Podbregar M; Fabjan A; Šoštarič M
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2021 May; 16(1):142. PubMed ID: 34030698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Propensity score analysis of outcomes following minimal access versus conventional aortic valve replacement.
Shehada SE; Öztürk Ö; Wottke M; Lange R
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Feb; 49(2):464-9; discussion 469-70. PubMed ID: 25732967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Initial clinical experience with minimally invasive surgical aortic valve replacement.
Abjigitova D; Veen KM; Mokhles MM; Bekkers JA; Oei FB; Bogers AJ
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2021 Jun; 62(3):268-277. PubMed ID: 33302611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mini-sternotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a randomised controlled trial.
Hancock HC; Maier RH; Kasim A; Mason J; Murphy G; Goodwin A; Owens WA; Akowuah E
BMJ Open; 2021 Jan; 11(1):e041398. PubMed ID: 33514577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
