These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24944988)

  • 1. Addition of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and On-Site Cytology to EUS-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy Increases Procedure Time but Not Diagnostic Accuracy.
    Keswani RN; Krishnan K; Wani S; Keefer L; Komanduri S
    Clin Endosc; 2014 May; 47(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 24944988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.
    Yousri M; Abusinna E; Tahoun N; Okasha HH; El-Habashi AH
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling versus FNA in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions: a large multicenter study.
    de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Flumignan VK; Najdawai F; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jul; 92(1):108-119.e3. PubMed ID: 32105712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration versus fine-needle biopsy and impact of rapid on-site evaluation for pancreatic masses.
    de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Hathorn KE; Madruga-Neto AC; Lee LS; Thompson CC
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Jun; 8(6):E738-E747. PubMed ID: 32490158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
    Chen YI; Chatterjee A; Berger R; Kanber Y; Wyse J; Lam E; Gan I; Auger M; Kenshil S; Telford J; Donnellan F; Quinlan J; Lutzak G; Alshamsi F; Parent J; Waschke K; Alghamdi A; Barkun J; Metrakos P; Chaudhury P; Martel M; Dorreen A; Candido K; Miller C; Adam V; Barkun A; Zogopoulos G; Wong C
    Endoscopy; 2022 Jan; 54(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 33506455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Cheng B; Zhang Y; Chen Q; Sun B; Deng Z; Shan H; Dou L; Wang J; Li Y; Yang X; Jiang T; Xu G; Wang G
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1314-1321. PubMed ID: 28733257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with or without rapid on-site evaluation for solid pancreatic lesions: five years of experience from a single center.
    Liu Y; Xiong D; Zhao Y; Meng Z; Wu X; Jiang Q; Wang Q; Wu D; Zhang S; Feng Y; Yang A
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023; 58(10):1185-1193. PubMed ID: 37114616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration
    Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Farias GFA; Madruga-Neto AC; Ryou M; Thompson CC
    World J Clin Cases; 2021 Dec; 9(34):10507-10517. PubMed ID: 35004982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy was not more cost-effective than fine-needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation in gastrointestinal lesions diagnosis.
    Sbeit W; Khoury T
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Aug; 49(8):944-947. PubMed ID: 33973746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration versus Fine-Needle Biopsy for Lymph Node Diagnosis: A Large Multicenter Comparative Analysis.
    de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Farias GFA; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
    Clin Endosc; 2020 Sep; 53(5):600-610. PubMed ID: 31794654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of EUS-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy versus EUS-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration: A Retrospective Analysis.
    Kuraoka N; Hashimoto S; Matsui S; Terai S
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 34071881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE: a retrospective study.
    Wong T; Pattarapuntakul T; Netinatsunton N; Ovartlarnporn B; Sottisuporn J; Chamroonkul N; Sripongpun P; Jandee S; Kaewdech A; Attasaranya S; Piratvisuth T
    World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jun; 20(1):215. PubMed ID: 35751053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An exclusive fine-needle biopsy approach to sampling solid lesions under EUS guidance: a prospective cohort study.
    Temnykh LM; Rahal MA; Zia Z; Al-Haddad MA
    Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf); 2020 Oct; 8(5):349-354. PubMed ID: 33163189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endoscopic ultrasound with combined fine needle aspiration plus biopsy improves diagnostic yield in solid pancreatic masses.
    Gonzalez A; Wadhwa V; Singh H; Khan S; Gupta K; Liang H; Hussain I; Vargo J; Jang S; Chahal P; Bhatt A; Siddiki H; Erim T; Sanaka MR
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 May; 57(5):610-617. PubMed ID: 34991430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: The changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition.
    Bang JY; Kirtane S; Krall K; Navaneethan U; Hasan M; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Dig Endosc; 2019 Mar; 31(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 30256458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
    Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
    Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of Fine Needle Biopsy (FNB) for Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-guided Tissue Acquisition of Pancreatic Masses to Negate the Need for Rapid On-site Evaluation: A Randomized Control Trial.
    De Lusong MAA; Pajes ANNI
    Acta Med Philipp; 2024; 58(1):51-56. PubMed ID: 38939857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of solid mass lesions of the pancreas: A retrospective comparison study of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy.
    Sweeney J; Soong L; Goyal A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Apr; 48(4):322-329. PubMed ID: 31903736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.