These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24945233)

  • 1. Hard evidence.
    Sorrel AL
    Tex Med; 2014 Jun; 110(6):49-52. PubMed ID: 24945233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medicine by the book. A gusher of guidelines for doctors can educate patients, too.
    Findlay S
    US News World Rep; 1992 Jul; 113(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 10119657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. AHCPR and private groups partner on pilot evidence reports. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.
    Okla Nurse; 1997; 42(2):33. PubMed ID: 9400243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An opportunity to improve informed consent and shared decision making: the role of the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in oncology.
    Paruch JL; Ko CY; Bilimoria KY
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Jan; 21(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 24197763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Effective Health Care Program: creating a dynamic system for discovering and reporting what works in health care.
    Slutsky JR; Clancy CM
    Am J Med Qual; 2005; 20(6):358-60. PubMed ID: 16280400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ten clinician-driven strategies for maximising value of Australian health care.
    Scott I
    Aust Health Rev; 2014 May; 38(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 24820956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. AHRQ director: 'we are not doing enough' on quality.
    Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2008 Nov; 15(11):111-3. PubMed ID: 18956578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Making sense of the evidence using comparative effectiveness to guide clinical decision making, policy and coverage.
    Carlos RC; Cronin P
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):1065-6. PubMed ID: 21820633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What does evidence mean? Can the law and medicine be reconciled?
    Eisenberg JM
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2001 Apr; 26(2):369-81. PubMed ID: 11330084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ten strategies to lower costs, improve quality, and engage patients: the view from leading health system CEOs.
    Cosgrove DM; Fisher M; Gabow P; Gottlieb G; Halvorson GC; James BC; Kaplan GS; Perlin JB; Petzel R; Steele GD; Toussaint JS
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2013 Feb; 32(2):321-7. PubMed ID: 23381525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The challenge of comparative effectiveness: getting the right information to the right people at the right time.
    Coopey M; James MD; Lawrence W; Clancy CM
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2008; 23(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 18281868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measure the impact. Research Web tools that provide opportunity for shared decision-making.
    Burstin H
    Health Manag Technol; 2001 Feb; 22(2):70. PubMed ID: 11225344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integrating patients' views into the guideline movement.
    Magoffin CJ
    Manag Care; 1995 May; 4(5):49-50. PubMed ID: 10142986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AHRQ: a tradition of evidence. Federal agency carries a rich history of involvement in today's evidence-based medicine movement, focusing on the "evidence inside" healthcare IT.
    Clancy CM
    Health Manag Technol; 2003 Aug; 24(8):26-9. PubMed ID: 12924057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality improvement in New Zealand healthcare. Part 6: keeping the patient front and centre to improve healthcare quality.
    Robb G; Seddon M;
    N Z Med J; 2006 Sep; 119(1242):U2174. PubMed ID: 16998575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. AHRQ series commentary 3: the United States addresses comparative effectiveness but not cost-effectiveness through the effective health-care program.
    Freemantle N; Drummond MF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):479-80. PubMed ID: 20346862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence-based versus experience-based decision making in clinical dentistry.
    Cruz MA
    J Am Coll Dent; 2000; 67(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 10812870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Taking the quality challenge: highlights from the AHRQ summit.
    Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 2005 May; 17(5):6-10, 1. PubMed ID: 16045103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An introduction to patient decision aids.
    Drug Ther Bull; 2012 Aug; 50(8):90-2. PubMed ID: 22875365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implementing shared decision making in diverse health care systems: the role of patient decision aids.
    O'Connor AM; Graham ID; Visser A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2005 Jun; 57(3):247-9. PubMed ID: 15893205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.