BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24946840)

  • 1. Working memory capacity predicts the beneficial effect of selective memory retrieval.
    Schlichting A; Aslan A; Holterman C; Bäuml KH
    Memory; 2015; 23(5):786-94. PubMed ID: 24946840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Part-list cuing effects in children: A developmental dissociation between the detrimental and beneficial effect.
    John T; Aslan A
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Feb; 166():705-712. PubMed ID: 28943058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The two faces of selective memory retrieval: recall specificity of the detrimental but not the beneficial effect.
    Bäuml KH; Dobler IM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jan; 41(1):246-53. PubMed ID: 24707790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retrieval practice can insulate items against intralist interference: Evidence from the list-length effect, output interference, and retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Kliegl O; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Feb; 42(2):202-14. PubMed ID: 26301963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The contribution of encoding and retrieval processes to proactive interference.
    Kliegl O; Pastötter B; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1778-89. PubMed ID: 25603166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual differences in working memory capacity predict retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Aslan A; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):264-9. PubMed ID: 21090906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Later maturation of the beneficial than the detrimental effect of selective memory retrieval.
    Aslan A; Bäuml KH
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Apr; 25(4):1025-30. PubMed ID: 24553360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retrieval-practice task affects relationship between working memory capacity and retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Storm BC; Bui DC
    Memory; 2016 Nov; 24(10):1407-18. PubMed ID: 26642868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The two faces of selective memory retrieval: Earlier decline of the beneficial than the detrimental effect with older age.
    Aslan A; Schlichting A; John T; Bäuml KH
    Psychol Aging; 2015 Dec; 30(4):824-34. PubMed ID: 26652723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual differences in working memory capacity and search efficiency.
    Miller AL; Unsworth N
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1149-1163. PubMed ID: 29845592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selective memory retrieval can impair and improve retrieval of other memories.
    Bäuml KH; Samenieh A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):488-94. PubMed ID: 21942495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Examining variation in working memory capacity and retrieval in cued recall.
    Unsworth N
    Memory; 2009 May; 17(4):386-96. PubMed ID: 19358013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual differences in working memory capacity and episodic retrieval: examining the dynamics of delayed and continuous distractor free recall.
    Unsworth N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1020-34. PubMed ID: 17983310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interpolated retrieval effects on list isolation: Individual differences in working memory capacity.
    Wahlheim CN; Alexander TR; Kane MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):619-642. PubMed ID: 30725377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influences of part-list cuing on different forms of episodic forgetting.
    Bäuml KH; Samenieh A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):366-75. PubMed ID: 21928931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociating the two faces of selective memory retrieval.
    Dobler IM; Bäuml KH
    Memory; 2012 Jul; 20(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 22639961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selective memory retrieval in social groups: When silence is golden and when it is not.
    Abel M; Bäuml KH
    Cognition; 2015 Jul; 140():40-8. PubMed ID: 25867998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variation in working memory capacity and episodic recall: the contributions of strategic encoding and contextual retrieval.
    Unsworth N; Spillers GJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Apr; 17(2):200-5. PubMed ID: 20382920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Working memory capacity and retrieval from long-term memory: the role of controlled search.
    Unsworth N; Brewer GA; Spillers GJ
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Feb; 41(2):242-54. PubMed ID: 23055120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Item-method directed forgetting and working memory capacity: A hierarchical multinomial modeling approach.
    Marevic I; Arnold NR; Rummel J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 May; 71(5):1070-1080. PubMed ID: 28326968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.