These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24947758)

  • 1. Competitor rule priming: evidence for priming of task rules in task switching.
    Katzir M; Ori B; Hsieh S; Meiran N
    Psychol Res; 2015 May; 79(3):446-62. PubMed ID: 24947758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resolving task rule incongruence during task switching by competitor rule suppression.
    Meiran N; Hsieh S; Dimov E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):992-1002. PubMed ID: 20565214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cue response dissociates inhibitory processes: task identity information is related to backward inhibition but not to competitor rule suppression.
    Regev S; Meiran N
    Psychol Res; 2017 Jan; 81(1):168-181. PubMed ID: 26762518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Smart inhibition": electrophysiological evidence for the suppression of conflict-generating task rules during task switching.
    Meiran N; Hsieh S; Chang CC
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 11(3):292-308. PubMed ID: 21590505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interaction of task readiness and automatic retrieval in task switching: negative priming and competitor priming.
    Waszak F; Hommel B; Allport A
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Jun; 33(4):595-610. PubMed ID: 16248325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "Optimal suppression" as a solution to the paradoxical cost of multitasking: examination of suppression specificity in task switching.
    Katzir M; Ori B; Meiran N
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):24-39. PubMed ID: 29075843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Inhibition and resource capacity during normal aging: a confrontation of the dorsal-ventral and frontal models in a modified version of negative priming].
    Martin S; Brouillet D; Guerdoux E; Tarrago R
    Encephale; 2006; 32(2 Pt 1):253-62. PubMed ID: 16910627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Components of competitor priming in task switching.
    Teskey ML; Masson MEJ
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Nov; 45(8):1384-1397. PubMed ID: 28718172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Go with the flow: how the consideration of joy versus pride influences automaticity.
    Katzir M; Ori B; Eyal T; Meiran N
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Feb; 155():57-66. PubMed ID: 25557202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cue-type manipulation dissociates two types of task set inhibition: backward inhibition and competitor rule suppression.
    Regev S; Meiran N
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):625-39. PubMed ID: 25822920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stimulus-category and response-repetition effects in task switching: an evaluation of four explanations.
    Druey MD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):125-46. PubMed ID: 23895451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selective impairment of masked priming in dual-task performance.
    Fischer R; Kiesel A; Kunde W; Schubert T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):572-95. PubMed ID: 20839135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The time course of the asymmetrical "local" switch cost: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Martin CD; Barcelo F; Hernandez M; Costa A
    Biol Psychol; 2011 Mar; 86(3):210-8. PubMed ID: 21167903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revisiting the effects of Parkinson's disease and frontal lobe lesions on task switching: the role of rule reconfiguration.
    Kehagia AA; Barker RA; Robbins TW
    J Neuropsychol; 2014 Mar; 8(1):53-74. PubMed ID: 23279799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repetition priming in the stop signal task: the electrophysiology of sequential effects of stopping.
    Oldenburg JFE; Roger C; Assecondi S; Verbruggen F; Fias W
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Oct; 50(12):2860-2868. PubMed ID: 22940427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The persisting influence of unattended auditory information: Negative priming in intentional auditory attention switching.
    Eben C; Koch I; Jolicoeur P; Nolden S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1835-1846. PubMed ID: 31898070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating task preparation and task performance as triggers of the backward inhibition effect.
    Prosser LJ; Yamaguchi M; Swainson R
    Psychol Res; 2023 Sep; 87(6):1816-1835. PubMed ID: 36571593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A carry-over task rule in task switching: an ERP investigation using a Go/Nogo paradigm.
    Umebayashi K; Okita T
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Feb; 92(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 23182873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Episodic retrieval and decaying inhibition in the competitor-rule suppression phenomenon.
    Hsieh S; Chang CC; Meiran N
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Nov; 141(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 23085143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Instructing item-specific switch probability: expectations modulate stimulus-action priming.
    Jargow J; Wolfensteller U; Pfeuffer CU; Ruge H
    Psychol Res; 2022 Oct; 86(7):2195-2214. PubMed ID: 35041058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.