423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24947934)
1. Mechanical performance of macrofibers of cellulose and chitin nanofibrils aligned by wet-stretching: a critical comparison.
Torres-Rendon JG; Schacher FH; Ifuku S; Walther A
Biomacromolecules; 2014 Jul; 15(7):2709-17. PubMed ID: 24947934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High performance cellulose nanocomposites: comparing the reinforcing ability of bacterial cellulose and nanofibrillated cellulose.
Lee KY; Tammelin T; Schulfter K; Kiiskinen H; Samela J; Bismarck A
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2012 Aug; 4(8):4078-86. PubMed ID: 22839594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Humidity and multiscale structure govern mechanical properties and deformation modes in films of native cellulose nanofibrils.
Benítez AJ; Torres-Rendon J; Poutanen M; Walther A
Biomacromolecules; 2013 Dec; 14(12):4497-506. PubMed ID: 24245557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Colloidal ionic assembly between anionic native cellulose nanofibrils and cationic block copolymer micelles into biomimetic nanocomposites.
Wang M; Olszewska A; Walther A; Malho JM; Schacher FH; Ruokolainen J; Ankerfors M; Laine J; Berglund LA; Osterberg M; Ikkala O
Biomacromolecules; 2011 Jun; 12(6):2074-81. PubMed ID: 21517114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiscale Control of Nanocellulose Assembly: Transferring Remarkable Nanoscale Fibril Mechanics to Macroscale Fibers.
Mittal N; Ansari F; Gowda V K; Brouzet C; Chen P; Larsson PT; Roth SV; Lundell F; Wågberg L; Kotov NA; Söderberg LD
ACS Nano; 2018 Jul; 12(7):6378-6388. PubMed ID: 29741364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Macrofibers with High Mechanical Performance Based on Aligned Bacterial Cellulose Nanofibers.
Yao J; Chen S; Chen Y; Wang B; Pei Q; Wang H
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2017 Jun; 9(24):20330-20339. PubMed ID: 28045246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Facile method for stiff, tough, and strong nanocomposites by direct exfoliation of multilayered graphene into native nanocellulose matrix.
Malho JM; Laaksonen P; Walther A; Ikkala O; Linder MB
Biomacromolecules; 2012 Apr; 13(4):1093-9. PubMed ID: 22372697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical behavior of transparent nanofibrillar cellulose-chitosan nanocomposite films in dry and wet conditions.
Wu T; Farnood R; O'Kelly K; Chen B
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Apr; 32():279-286. PubMed ID: 24508714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stretchable and strong cellulose nanopaper structures based on polymer-coated nanofiber networks: an alternative to nonwoven porous membranes from electrospinning.
Sehaqui H; Morimune S; Nishino T; Berglund LA
Biomacromolecules; 2012 Nov; 13(11):3661-7. PubMed ID: 23046114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Super-Strong, Super-Stiff Macrofibers with Aligned, Long Bacterial Cellulose Nanofibers.
Wang S; Jiang F; Xu X; Kuang Y; Fu K; Hitz E; Hu L
Adv Mater; 2017 Sep; 29(35):. PubMed ID: 28731208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Structure and mechanical properties of wet-spun fibers made from natural cellulose nanofibers.
Iwamoto S; Isogai A; Iwata T
Biomacromolecules; 2011 Mar; 12(3):831-6. PubMed ID: 21302950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Strong and tough cellulose nanopaper with high specific surface area and porosity.
Sehaqui H; Zhou Q; Ikkala O; Berglund LA
Biomacromolecules; 2011 Oct; 12(10):3638-44. PubMed ID: 21888417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Control of size and viscoelastic properties of nanofibrillated cellulose from palm tree by varying the TEMPO-mediated oxidation time.
Benhamou K; Dufresne A; Magnin A; Mortha G; Kaddami H
Carbohydr Polym; 2014 Jan; 99():74-83. PubMed ID: 24274481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Understanding Toughness in Bioinspired Cellulose Nanofibril/Polymer Nanocomposites.
Benítez AJ; Lossada F; Zhu B; Rudolph T; Walther A
Biomacromolecules; 2016 Jul; 17(7):2417-26. PubMed ID: 27303948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of crystal orientation on cellulose nanocrystals-cellulose acetate nanocomposite fibers prepared by dry spinning.
Chen S; Schueneman G; Pipes RB; Youngblood J; Moon RJ
Biomacromolecules; 2014 Oct; 15(10):3827-35. PubMed ID: 25226382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sustainable Chitin Nanofibrils Provide Outstanding Flame-Retardant Nanopapers.
Riehle F; Hoenders D; Guo J; Eckert A; Ifuku S; Walther A
Biomacromolecules; 2019 Feb; 20(2):1098-1108. PubMed ID: 30615421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preparation of nano cellulose fibers and its application in kappa-carrageenan based film.
Savadekar NR; Karande VS; Vigneshwaran N; Bharimalla AK; Mhaske ST
Int J Biol Macromol; 2012 Dec; 51(5):1008-13. PubMed ID: 22940239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An ultrastrong nanofibrillar biomaterial: the strength of single cellulose nanofibrils revealed via sonication-induced fragmentation.
Saito T; Kuramae R; Wohlert J; Berglund LA; Isogai A
Biomacromolecules; 2013 Jan; 14(1):248-53. PubMed ID: 23215584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Controlled Silylation of Nanofibrillated Cellulose in Water: Reinforcement of a Model Polydimethylsiloxane Network.
Zhang Z; Tingaut P; Rentsch D; Zimmermann T; Sèbe G
ChemSusChem; 2015 Aug; 8(16):2681-90. PubMed ID: 26202543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Counterion Size and Nature Control Structural and Mechanical Response in Cellulose Nanofibril Nanopapers.
Benítez AJ; Walther A
Biomacromolecules; 2017 May; 18(5):1642-1653. PubMed ID: 28351134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
