397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24948151)
1. Quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow--clinical and research applications.
Schindler TH; Quercioli A; Valenta I; Ambrosio G; Wahl RL; Dilsizian V
Semin Nucl Med; 2014 Jul; 44(4):274-93. PubMed ID: 24948151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cardiac PET imaging for the detection and monitoring of coronary artery disease and microvascular health.
Schindler TH; Schelbert HR; Quercioli A; Dilsizian V
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jun; 3(6):623-40. PubMed ID: 20541718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Longitudinal myocardial blood flow gradient and CAD detection.
Valenta I; Wahl RL; Schindler TH
Curr Cardiol Rep; 2015 Jan; 17(1):550. PubMed ID: 25417123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative PET/CT measures of myocardial flow reserve and atherosclerosis for cardiac risk assessment and predicting adverse patient outcomes.
Valenta I; Dilsizian V; Quercioli A; Ruddy TD; Schindler TH
Curr Cardiol Rep; 2013 Mar; 15(3):344. PubMed ID: 23397541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic value of PET-measured longitudinal flow gradient for the identification of coronary artery disease.
Valenta I; Quercioli A; Schindler TH
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Apr; 7(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 24631507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Potential Role of Cardiovascular Imaging in Improving Cardiovascular Outcome in Coronary Artery Disease.
Valenta I; Mirpour S; Marashdeh W; Schindler TH
Curr Pharm Des; 2016; 22(37):5718-5729. PubMed ID: 27526791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PET-determined myocardial perfusion and flow in coronary artery disease characterization.
Valenta I; Schindler TH
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2024 Jun; 55(2S):S44-S50. PubMed ID: 38403519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Myocardial blood flow: Putting it into clinical perspective.
Schindler TH
J Nucl Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1056-1071. PubMed ID: 26711100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cardiac PET/Computed Tomography Applications and Cardiovascular Outcome.
Schindler TH
PET Clin; 2015 Jul; 10(3):441-59. PubMed ID: 26099678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Positron-emitting myocardial blood flow tracers and clinical potential.
Schindler TH
Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2015; 57(6):588-606. PubMed ID: 25637500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of insulin resistance, obesity, and diabetes mellitus on vascular tone and myocardial blood flow.
Valenta I; Dilsizian V; Quercioli A; Schelbert HR; Schindler TH
Curr Cardiol Rep; 2012 Apr; 14(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 22205177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging and [
Everaars H; van Diemen PA; Bom MJ; Schumacher SP; de Winter RW; van de Ven PM; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Hofman MBM; van der Geest RJ; Götte MJ; van Rossum AC; Nijveldt R; Danad I; Driessen RS; Knaapen P
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Jul; 47(7):1688-1697. PubMed ID: 31822958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Positron Emission Tomography-Determined Hyperemic Flow, Myocardial Flow Reserve, and Flow Gradient-Quo Vadis?
Leucker TM; Valenta I; Schindler TH
Front Cardiovasc Med; 2017; 4():46. PubMed ID: 28770213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined evaluation of regional coronary artery calcium and myocardial perfusion by
Zampella E; Acampa W; Assante R; Nappi C; Gaudieri V; Mainolfi CG; Green R; Cantoni V; Panico M; Klain M; Petretta M; Slomka PJ; Cuocolo A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Apr; 45(4):521-529. PubMed ID: 29372272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. SPECT myocardial blood flow quantitation toward clinical use: a comparative study with
Hsu B; Hu LH; Yang BH; Chen LC; Chen YK; Ting CH; Hung GU; Huang WS; Wu TC
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Jan; 44(1):117-128. PubMed ID: 27585576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PET-measured longitudinal flow gradient correlates with invasive fractional flow reserve in CAD patients.
Valenta I; Antoniou A; Marashdeh W; Leucker T; Kasper E; Jones SR; Dannals RF; Solnes L; Pomper MG; Schindler TH
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 May; 18(5):538-548. PubMed ID: 27325812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Added prognostic value of myocardial blood flow quantitation in rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging.
Farhad H; Dunet V; Bachelard K; Allenbach G; Kaufmann PA; Prior JO
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 14(12):1203-10. PubMed ID: 23660750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion in the detection of significant coronary artery disease: cutoff values and diagnostic accuracy of quantitative [(15)O]H2O PET imaging.
Danad I; Uusitalo V; Kero T; Saraste A; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Heymans MW; Kajander SA; Pietilä M; James S; Sörensen J; Knaapen P; Knuuti J
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Oct; 64(14):1464-75. PubMed ID: 25277618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integrated myocardial flow reserve (iMFR) assessment: optimized PET blood flow quantification for diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
Poitrasson-Rivière A; Moody JB; Renaud JM; Hagio T; Arida-Moody L; Buckley CJ; Al-Mallah MH; Nallamothu BK; Weinberg RL; Ficaro EP; Murthy VL
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Dec; 51(1):136-146. PubMed ID: 37807004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Underestimation of myocardial blood flow by dynamic perfusion CT: Explanations by two-compartment model analysis and limited temporal sampling of dynamic CT.
Ishida M; Kitagawa K; Ichihara T; Natsume T; Nakayama R; Nagasawa N; Kubooka M; Ito T; Uno M; Goto Y; Nagata M; Sakuma H
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 26851149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
