These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24948208)

  • 1. My vision for current problems in diagnostic radiology: 2014 and beyond.
    Bhargava P
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2014; 43(4):159-61. PubMed ID: 24948208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review in diagnostic radiology: current state and a vision for the future.
    Mahgerefteh S; Kruskal JB; Yam CS; Blachar A; Sosna J
    Radiographics; 2009; 29(5):1221-31. PubMed ID: 19564252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Which points deserve special attention in the new guidelines on X-ray use (testing guidelines for experts and quality assurance guidelines)?].
    Ewen K; Lauber I
    Radiologe; 2004 Dec; 44(12):1197-205. PubMed ID: 15580428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ACR practice guideline for the performance and interpretation of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
    Woodard PK; Bluemke DA; Cascade PN; Finn JP; Stillman AE; Higgins CB; White RD; Yucel EK;
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Sep; 3(9):665-76. PubMed ID: 17412147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring imaging quality in Great Britain: a quest to improve patient care.
    Husband J; Adam J; ;
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 May; 5(5):621-5. PubMed ID: 18442765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. American Board of Radiology Perspective on Maintenance of Certification: Part IV--Practice Quality Improvement for Diagnostic Radiology.
    Strife JL; Kun LE; Becker GJ; Dunnick NR; Bosma J; Hattery RR
    Radiographics; 2007; 27(3):769-74. PubMed ID: 17495291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The American Board of Radiology perspective on maintenance of certification: part IV--practice quality improvement in diagnostic radiology.
    Strife JL; Kun LE; Becker GJ; Dunnick NR; Bosma J; Hattery RR
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 May; 4(5):300-4. PubMed ID: 17467612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Defining quality in radiology.
    Blackmore CC
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Apr; 4(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 17412271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Check, mate: integrating checklists within diagnostic radiology departments.
    Iyer RS; Otjen JP; Weinberger E
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Jul; 10(7):488-90. PubMed ID: 23499403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical audits: the European Society of Radiology Perspective.
    Centonze M
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Jun; 8(6):438-42. PubMed ID: 21636060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How do training, education, and experience affect quality in radiology?
    Weinreb JC; Wilcox PA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jul; 1(7):510-5. PubMed ID: 17411641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Standard of care for nonradiologist interpretations.
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Aug; 197(2):W358. PubMed ID: 21785066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Standardization in radiology--protocols, procedures, and reports: best for patients and providers.
    Ellenbogen PH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Sep; 10(9):641. PubMed ID: 23910383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ACR practice guideline for the performance and interpretation of cardiac computed tomography (CT).
    Jacobs JE; Boxt LM; Desjardins B; Fishman EK; Larson PA; Schoepf J;
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Sep; 3(9):677-85. PubMed ID: 17412148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality and creativity.
    Gunderman RB
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Dec; 8(12):824-5. PubMed ID: 22136995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The demand for proof of quality.
    Patti JA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Dec; 8(12):817. PubMed ID: 22136992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous needle biopsy.
    Gupta S; Wallace MJ; Cardella JF; Kundu S; Miller DL; Rose SC;
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Jul; 21(7):969-75. PubMed ID: 20304676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality initiatives: Key performance indicators for measuring and improving radiology department performance.
    Abujudeh HH; Kaewlai R; Asfaw BA; Thrall JH
    Radiographics; 2010 May; 30(3):571-80. PubMed ID: 20219841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality improvement guidelines for central venous access.
    Dariushnia SR; Wallace MJ; Siddiqi NH; Towbin RB; Wojak JC; Kundu S; Cardella JF;
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Jul; 21(7):976-81. PubMed ID: 20610180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Invited commentary.
    Kruskal JB; Reedy A
    Radiographics; 2010 May; 30(3):580-2. PubMed ID: 20480541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.