BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24948210)

  • 1. Radiology peer-review feedback scorecards: optimizing transparency, accessibility, and education in a children׳s hospital.
    Iyer RS; Munsell A; Weinberger E
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2014; 43(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 24948210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimizing peer review: A year of experience after instituting a real-time comment-enhanced program at a children's hospital.
    Swanson JO; Thapa MM; Iyer RS; Otto RK; Weinberger E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 May; 198(5):1121-5. PubMed ID: 22528902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer Review: Lessons Learned in A Pediatric Radiology Department.
    Stanescu AL; Parisi MT; Weinberger E; Ferguson MR; Otto RK; Iyer RS
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2016; 45(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 26489791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meaningful Peer Review in Radiology: A Review of Current Practices and Potential Future Directions.
    Moriarity AK; Hawkins CM; Geis JR; Dreyer KJ; Kamer AP; Khandheria P; Morey J; Whitfill J; Wiggins RH; Itri JN
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Dec; 13(12 Pt A):1519-1524. PubMed ID: 28233533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review comments augment diagnostic error characterization and departmental quality assurance: 1-year experience from a children's hospital.
    Iyer RS; Swanson JO; Otto RK; Weinberger E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jan; 200(1):132-7. PubMed ID: 23255752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. RADPEER scoring white paper.
    Jackson VP; Cushing T; Abujudeh HH; Borgstede JP; Chin KW; Grimes CK; Larson DB; Larson PA; Pyatt RS; Thorwarth WT
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Jan; 6(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 19111267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consensus-oriented group peer review: a new process to review radiologist work output.
    Alkasab TK; Harvey HB; Gowda V; Thrall JH; Rosenthal DI; Gazelle GS
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Feb; 11(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 24139321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiology peer review as an opportunity to reduce errors and improve patient care.
    Halsted MJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Dec; 1(12):984-7. PubMed ID: 17411742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates.
    Borgstede JP; Lewis RS; Bhargavan M; Sunshine JH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jan; 1(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 17411521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. RADPEER peer review: relevance, use, concerns, challenges, and direction forward.
    Abujudeh H; Pyatt RS; Bruno MA; Chetlen AL; Buck D; Hobbs SK; Roth C; Truwit C; Agarwal R; Kennedy ST; Glenn L
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Sep; 11(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 24842585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The next level of radiology peer review: enterprise-wide education and improvement.
    Butler GJ; Forghani R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 May; 10(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 23642877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer review in clinical radiology practice.
    Kaewlai R; Abujudeh H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):W158-62. PubMed ID: 22826416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality assurance in radiology: peer review and peer feedback.
    Strickland NH
    Clin Radiol; 2015 Nov; 70(11):1158-64. PubMed ID: 26223739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality initiatives: department scorecard: a tool to help drive imaging care delivery performance.
    Donnelly LF; Gessner KE; Dickerson JM; Koch BL; Towbin AJ; Lehkamp TW; Moskovitz J; Brody AS; Dumoulin CL; Jones BV
    Radiographics; 2010 Nov; 30(7):2029-38. PubMed ID: 20801869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review in cardiothoracic radiology.
    Kanne JP
    J Thorac Imaging; 2014 Sep; 29(5):270-6; quiz 277-8. PubMed ID: 25160595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance results for a workstation-integrated radiology peer review quality assurance program.
    O'Keeffe MM; Davis TM; Siminoski K
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2016 Jun; 28(3):294-8. PubMed ID: 26892609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Masters of radiology panel discussion: defining a quality dashboard for radiology--what are the right metrics?
    Forman HP; Larson DB; Kazerooni EA; Norbash A; Crowe JK; Javitt MC; Beauchamp NJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Apr; 200(4):839-44. PubMed ID: 23521458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance-based assessment of radiology practitioners: promoting improvement in accordance with the 2007 joint commission standards.
    Donnelly LF
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Oct; 4(10):699-703. PubMed ID: 17903754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comment on "RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates".
    Cascade PN
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Apr; 1(4):295-6; author reply 297. PubMed ID: 17411586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. RAD-AID Asha Jyoti Mammogram Quality Assessment in India: Optimizing Mobile Radiology.
    Mango VL; Ha R; Nguyen B; Mema E; Kobeski J; Singh T; Khandelwal N
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Jul; 13(7):831-4. PubMed ID: 27162043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.