500 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24948648)
1. Genomic prediction in French Charolais beef cattle using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism markers.
Gunia M; Saintilan R; Venot E; Hozé C; Fouilloux MN; Phocas F
J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3258-69. PubMed ID: 24948648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficiency of multi-breed genomic selection for dairy cattle breeds with different sizes of reference population.
Hozé C; Fritz S; Phocas F; Boichard D; Ducrocq V; Croiseau P
J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3918-29. PubMed ID: 24704232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genome-wide association study and prediction of genomic breeding values for fatty-acid composition in Korean Hanwoo cattle using a high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism array.
Bhuiyan MSA; Kim YK; Kim HJ; Lee DH; Lee SH; Yoon HB; Lee SH
J Anim Sci; 2018 Sep; 96(10):4063-4075. PubMed ID: 30265318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of genomic predictions for feed efficiency traits of beef cattle using 50K and imputed HD genotypes.
Lu D; Akanno EC; Crowley JJ; Schenkel F; Li H; De Pauw M; Moore SS; Wang Z; Li C; Stothard P; Plastow G; Miller SP; Basarab JA
J Anim Sci; 2016 Apr; 94(4):1342-53. PubMed ID: 27135994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extent of linkage disequilibrium, consistency of gametic phase, and imputation accuracy within and across Canadian dairy breeds.
Larmer SG; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2014 May; 97(5):3128-41. PubMed ID: 24582440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genomic prediction using different estimation methodology, blending and cross-validation techniques for growth traits and visual scores in Hereford and Braford cattle.
Campos GS; Reimann FA; Cardoso LL; Ferreira CER; Junqueira VS; Schmidt PI; Braccini Neto J; Yokoo MJI; Sollero BP; Boligon AA; Cardoso FF
J Anim Sci; 2018 Jun; 96(7):2579-2595. PubMed ID: 29741705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of genomic prediction when combining two related crossbred populations.
Vallée A; van Arendonk JA; Bovenhuis H
J Anim Sci; 2014 Oct; 92(10):4342-8. PubMed ID: 25149337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of training strategies on the accuracy of genomic predictors in United States Red Angus cattle.
Lee J; Kachman SD; Spangler ML
J Anim Sci; 2017 Aug; 95(8):3406-3414. PubMed ID: 28805929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population.
Khansefid M; Pryce JE; Bolormaa S; Miller SP; Wang Z; Li C; Goddard ME
J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3270-83. PubMed ID: 25074450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracies of direct genomic breeding values in Hereford beef cattle using national or international training populations.
Saatchi M; Ward J; Garrick DJ
J Anim Sci; 2013 Apr; 91(4):1538-51. PubMed ID: 23345550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genomic clustering helps to improve prediction in a multibreed population.
Ventura R; Larmer S; Schenkel FS; Miller SP; Sullivan P
J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 94(5):1844-56. PubMed ID: 27285682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genomic predictions for economically important traits in Brazilian Braford and Hereford beef cattle using true and imputed genotypes.
Piccoli ML; Brito LF; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 28100165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle.
Bolormaa S; Pryce JE; Kemper K; Savin K; Hayes BJ; Barendse W; Zhang Y; Reich CM; Mason BA; Bunch RJ; Harrison BE; Reverter A; Herd RM; Tier B; Graser HU; Goddard ME
J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3088-104. PubMed ID: 23658330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assets of imputation to ultra-high density for productive and functional traits.
Jiménez-Montero JA; Gianola D; Weigel K; Alenda R; González-Recio O
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Sep; 96(9):6047-58. PubMed ID: 23810591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of genomic predictions in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle.
Boison SA; Utsunomiya ATH; Santos DJA; Neves HHR; Carvalheiro R; Mészáros G; Utsunomiya YT; do Carmo AS; Verneque RS; Machado MA; Panetto JCC; Garcia JF; Sölkner J; da Silva MVGB
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jul; 100(7):5479-5490. PubMed ID: 28527809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.
Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels.
Erbe M; Hayes BJ; Matukumalli LK; Goswami S; Bowman PJ; Reich CM; Mason BA; Goddard ME
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):4114-29. PubMed ID: 22720968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of genome-wide imputation in Braford and Hereford beef cattle.
Piccoli ML; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Larmer SG; Schenkel FS
BMC Genet; 2014 Dec; 15():157. PubMed ID: 25543517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models.
Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Wang H; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK
J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4090-8. PubMed ID: 23893997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
