These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24950254)
1. Cochlear dead regions constrain the benefit of combining acoustic stimulation with electric stimulation. Zhang T; Dorman MF; Gifford R; Moore BC Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 24950254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Longitudinal outcomes of cochlear implantation and bimodal hearing in a large group of adults: A multicenter clinical study. Kelsall D; Lupo J; Biever A Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(1):102773. PubMed ID: 33161258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field. Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of hearing aid bandwidth on speech recognition performance of listeners using a cochlear implant and contralateral hearing aid (bimodal hearing). Neuman AC; Svirsky MA Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):553-61. PubMed ID: 23632973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Benefits of Bimodal Stimulation. van Loon MC; Smits C; Smit CF; Hensen EF; Merkus P Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jul; 38(6):e100-e106. PubMed ID: 28441230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The benefits of bimodal hearing: effect of frequency region and acoustic bandwidth. Sheffield SW; Gifford RH Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(3):151-63. PubMed ID: 24556850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the Quality of Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing: Implications for Combined Electroacoustic Stimulation With Cochlear Implants. Spitzer ER; Landsberger DM; Friedmann DR Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):475-486. PubMed ID: 32976249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation With Hearing Preservation: Effect of Cochlear Implant Low-Frequency Cutoff on Speech Understanding and Perceived Listening Difficulty. Gifford RH; Davis TJ; Sunderhaus LW; Menapace C; Buck B; Crosson J; O'Neill L; Beiter A; Segel P Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):539-553. PubMed ID: 28301392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant. Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues. Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study. Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors constraining the benefit to speech understanding of combining information from low-frequency hearing and a cochlear implant. Dorman MF; Cook S; Spahr A; Zhang T; Loiselle L; Schramm D; Whittingham J; Gifford R Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():107-11. PubMed ID: 25285624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Moore BC; Huss M; Vickers DA; Glasberg BR; Alcántara JI Br J Audiol; 2000 Aug; 34(4):205-24. PubMed ID: 10997450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cochlear implantation in adults with asymmetric hearing loss. Firszt JB; Holden LK; Reeder RM; Cowdrey L; King S Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):521-33. PubMed ID: 22441359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]