BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24950259)

  • 1. Quantitative evaluation of enhancement patterns in focal solid liver lesions with Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI.
    Haimerl M; Wächtler M; Zeman F; Verloh N; Platzek I; Schreyer AG; Stroszczynski C; Wiggermann P
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e100315. PubMed ID: 24950259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging features of hepatic hemangioma compared with enhanced computed tomography.
    Tateyama A; Fukukura Y; Takumi K; Shindo T; Kumagae Y; Kamimura K; Nakajo M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Nov; 18(43):6269-76. PubMed ID: 23180948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cirrhotic liver parenchyma: A comparison between gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid and gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid.
    Lin CY; Chang WC; Chou CT; Chen RC
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2015 Nov; 78(11):666-72. PubMed ID: 26341453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: differentiation between focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma].
    Portilha MA; Pedro MT; Ruivo C; Semedo LC; Marques C; Alves FC
    Acta Med Port; 2011 Dec; 24 Suppl 2():531-8. PubMed ID: 22849944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Images of Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography in multistep hepatocarcinogenesis: comparison with Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI.
    Ohama H; Imai Y; Nakashima O; Kogita S; Takamura M; Hori M; Seki Y; Sawai Y; Igura T; Fukuda K; Makino Y; Morimoto O; Ohsawa M; Sakamoto M; Murakami T
    J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jun; 49(6):1081-93. PubMed ID: 23903870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic performance and description of morphological features of focal nodular hyperplasia in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging: results of a multicenter trial.
    Zech CJ; Grazioli L; Breuer J; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Jul; 43(7):504-11. PubMed ID: 18580333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Added value of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced Hepatobiliary phase MR imaging in evaluation of focal solid hepatic lesions.
    Haimerl M; Wächtler M; Platzek I; Müller-Wille R; Niessen C; Hoffstetter P; Schreyer AG; Stroszczynski C; Wiggermann P
    BMC Med Imaging; 2013 Dec; 13():41. PubMed ID: 24289722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Liver tumors: comparison of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA.
    Vogl TJ; Kümmel S; Hammerstingl R; Schellenbeck M; Schumacher G; Balzer T; Schwarz W; Müller PK; Bechstein WO; Mack MG; Söllner O; Felix R
    Radiology; 1996 Jul; 200(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 8657946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for HCC and dysplastic nodules and comparison of detection sensitivity versus MDCT.
    Inoue T; Kudo M; Komuta M; Hayaishi S; Ueda T; Takita M; Kitai S; Hatanaka K; Yada N; Hagiwara S; Chung H; Sakurai T; Ueshima K; Sakamoto M; Maenishi O; Hyodo T; Okada M; Kumano S; Murakami T
    J Gastroenterol; 2012 Sep; 47(9):1036-47. PubMed ID: 22526270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast enhanced liver MRI in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: inverse appearance of focal confluent fibrosis on delayed phase MR images with hepatocyte specific versus extracellular gadolinium based contrast agents.
    Husarik DB; Gupta RT; Ringe KI; Boll DT; Merkle EM
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Dec; 18(12):1549-54. PubMed ID: 21958599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI for hepatocellular carcinoma: quantitative evaluation of tumor enhancement in hepatobiliary phase.
    Saito K; Kotake F; Ito N; Ozuki T; Mikami R; Abe K; Shimazaki Y
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2005; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 16127248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Imaging Features of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Quantitative and Qualitative Comparison Between MRI-Enhanced With Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA.
    Son J; Hwang SH; Park S; Han K; Chung YE; Choi JY; Kim MJ; Park MS
    Invest Radiol; 2019 Aug; 54(8):494-499. PubMed ID: 31094878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Speckled Enhancement" on Gd-EOB-DTPA Enhanced MR Imaging of Primary Hepatic Mucosa-associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma.
    Hyodo R; Takehara Y; Nishida A; Matsushima M; Naganawa S
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2023 Jul; 22(3):273-281. PubMed ID: 34615837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gd-EOB-DTPA Enhanced MRI Features of Liver Hemangiomatosis Coexistent with GCH.
    Liu D; Qiao Z; Xu L; Fu F; Ye A; Hu C
    Curr Med Imaging; 2022; 18(13):1390-1395. PubMed ID: 35657047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diffusion weighted imaging of liver lesions suspect for metastases: Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and lesion contrast are independent from Gd-EOB-DTPA administration.
    Benndorf M; Schelhorn J; Dietzel M; Kaiser WA; Baltzer PA
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):e849-53. PubMed ID: 22575171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimization of the dynamic, Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI of the liver: the effect of the injection rate.
    Schmid-Tannwald C; Herrmann K; Oto A; Panteleon A; Reiser M; Zech C
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Nov; 53(9):961-5. PubMed ID: 23024179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of abdominal solid organ and major vessel: comparison of enhancement effect between Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA.
    Tamada T; Ito K; Sone T; Yamamoto A; Yoshida K; Kakuba K; Tanimoto D; Higashi H; Yamashita T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Mar; 29(3):636-40. PubMed ID: 19243060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhancement characteristics of liver metastases, hepatocellular carcinomas, and hemangiomas with Gd-EOB-DTPA: preliminary results with dynamic MR imaging.
    Reimer P; Rummeny EJ; Daldrup HE; Hesse T; Balzer T; Tombach B; Peters PE
    Eur Radiol; 1997; 7(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 9038130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of hepatobiliary uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA on the hepatic venous phase of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging on a 3.0-T apparatus: comparison between Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA.
    Fujinaga Y; Ohya A; Matsushita T; Kurozumi M; Ueda K; Kitou Y; Ueda H; Kadoya M
    Jpn J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 29(10):695-700. PubMed ID: 22009420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhotic liver enhancement using Gd-EOB-DTPA.
    Frericks BB; Loddenkemper C; Huppertz A; Valdeig S; Stroux A; Seja M; Wolf KJ; Albrecht T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1053-60. PubMed ID: 19770329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.