These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24950348)

  • 1. Does temporal preparation facilitate visual processing in a selective manner? Evidence from attentional capture.
    Seibold VC; Rolke B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():51-61. PubMed ID: 24950348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward the influence of temporal attention on the selection of targets in a visual search task: An ERP study.
    Rolke B; Festl F; Seibold VC
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Nov; 53(11):1690-1701. PubMed ID: 27479494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does temporal preparation speed up visual processing? Evidence from the N2pc.
    Seibold VC; Rolke B
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Jun; 51(6):529-38. PubMed ID: 24611621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal preparation accelerates spatial selection by facilitating bottom-up processing.
    Balke J; Rolke B; Seibold VC
    Brain Res; 2022 Feb; 1777():147765. PubMed ID: 34951971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of temporal predictability on exogenous attentional modulation of feedforward processing in the striate cortex.
    Dassanayake TL; Michie PT; Fulham R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Jul; 105():9-16. PubMed ID: 27114044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.
    Grubert A; Fahrenfort J; Olivers CNL; Eimer M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():843-858. PubMed ID: 27554532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes.
    Lamy D; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1003-20. PubMed ID: 14585019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs.
    Wykowska A; Schubö A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distraction by deviance: comparing the effects of auditory and visual deviant stimuli on auditory and visual target processing.
    Leiva A; Parmentier FB; Andrés P
    Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 25270560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distraction by irrelevant sound during foreperiods selectively impairs temporal preparation.
    Steinborn MB; Langner R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):405-18. PubMed ID: 21333960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: a review and new evidence from event-related potentials.
    Correa A; Lupiáñez J; Madrid E; Tudela P
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1076(1):116-28. PubMed ID: 16516173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increased visual task difficulty enhances attentional capture by both visual and auditory distractor stimuli.
    Sugimoto F; Katayama J
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():55-62. PubMed ID: 28377160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of action planning on spatial perception: attention matters.
    Kirsch W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Mar; 156():22-31. PubMed ID: 25617850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Towards a resolution of the attentional-capture debate.
    Carmel T; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1772-82. PubMed ID: 26280266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal attention boosts perceptual effects of spatial attention and feature-based attention.
    Seibold VC; Stepper MY; Rolke B
    Brain Cogn; 2020 Jul; 142():105570. PubMed ID: 32447188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attention is spontaneously biased toward regularities.
    Zhao J; Al-Aidroos N; Turk-Browne NB
    Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):667-77. PubMed ID: 23558552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual organization, visual attention, and objecthood.
    Kimchi R; Yeshurun Y; Spehar B; Pirkner Y
    Vision Res; 2016 Sep; 126():34-51. PubMed ID: 26440865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Irrelevant reward and selection histories have different influences on task-relevant attentional selection.
    MacLean MH; Giesbrecht B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1515-28. PubMed ID: 25813737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.