614 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24950810)
1. Adhesion of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements may affect the integrity of tooth structure in the open sandwich technique.
Czarnecka B; Kruszelnicki A; Kao A; Strykowska M; Nicholson JW
Dent Mater; 2014 Dec; 30(12):e301-5. PubMed ID: 24950810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shear bond strength of six restorative materials.
Almuammar MF; Schulman A; Salama FS
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 25(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 12049082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bond strength of glass-ionomer cements to caries-affected dentin.
Palma-Dibb RG; de Castro CG; Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Chinelatti MA
J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 12729084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
Chuang SF; Jin YT; Tsai PF; Wong TY
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 11552169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microtensile bond strength of tooth-colored materials to primary tooth dentin.
Suwatviroj P; Messer LB; Palamara JE
Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 15080362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
Wilder AD; Swift EJ; May KN; Thompson JY; McDougal RA
J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bond strength and interface micromorphology of an improved resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
Pereira PN; Yamada T; Tei R; Tagami J
Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9545887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of configuration factor on gap formation in hybrid composite resin, low-shrinkage composite resin and resin-modified glass ionomer.
Boroujeni PM; Mousavinasab SM; Hasanli E
J Investig Clin Dent; 2015 May; 6(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 24415719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of enamel conditioning on bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composites.
Attin T; Buchalla W; Hellwig E
J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Jul; 76(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 8814631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins.
Buchalla W; Attin T; Hellwig E
J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 9238882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
Dietrich T; Lösche AC; Lösche GM; Roulet JF
J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: bonding to enamel and dentin.
Fritz UB; Finger WJ; Uno S
Dent Mater; 1996 May; 12(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 9002858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bonding effectiveness and interfacial characterization of a nano-filled resin-modified glass-ionomer.
Coutinho E; Cardoso MV; De Munck J; Neves AA; Van Landuyt KL; Poitevin A; Peumans M; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1347-57. PubMed ID: 19595446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
