These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24951225)

  • 1. Visual presentation of statistical concepts in diagnostic testing: the 2 × 2 diagram.
    Johnson KM; Johnson BK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):W14-20. PubMed ID: 24951225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new system of visual presentation of analysis of test performance: the "double-ring" diagram.
    Stefadouros MA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 Oct; 46(10):1151-8. PubMed ID: 7691997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fundamental measures of diagnostic examination performance: usefulness for clinical decision making and research.
    Langlotz CP
    Radiology; 2003 Jul; 228(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 12832567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity, specificity and predictive values.
    Akobeng AK
    Acta Paediatr; 2007 Mar; 96(3):338-41. PubMed ID: 17407452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical graphics in AJG: save the ink for the information.
    Connor JT
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Jul; 104(7):1624-30. PubMed ID: 19574966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating sensitivity and specificity from positive predictive value, negative predictive value and prevalence: application to surveillance systems for hospital-acquired infections.
    Kelly H; Bull A; Russo P; McBryde ES
    J Hosp Infect; 2008 Jun; 69(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 18448199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists.
    Nakagawa S; Cuthill IC
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 Nov; 82(4):591-605. PubMed ID: 17944619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values: diagnosing purple mange.
    Collier J; Huebscher R
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2010 Apr; 22(4):205-9. PubMed ID: 20409258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PowerPointing.
    Rogers LF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):973. PubMed ID: 11641149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Education techniques for lifelong learning: making a PowerPoint presentation.
    Collins J
    Radiographics; 2004; 24(4):1177-83. PubMed ID: 15256637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Aesthetic and visual dynamics of the presentation. Basic concepts].
    González-Tortosa J
    Neurocirugia (Astur); 2006 Apr; 17(2):148-56; discussion 156-7. PubMed ID: 16721482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Methodology of a scientific study: from the formulation of the problem to the interpretation of the results--applications to radiology].
    Bertrand P
    Sante; 1996; 6(3):139-44. PubMed ID: 8764446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The meaning of diagnostic test results: a spreadsheet for swift data analysis.
    Maceneaney PM; Malone DE
    Clin Radiol; 2000 Mar; 55(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 10708618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Animated diagrams in teaching statistics.
    Wender KF; Muehlboeck JS
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2003 May; 35(2):255-8. PubMed ID: 12834081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Getting the picture: medical images on the Web.
    Farrell A
    Med Ref Serv Q; 2006; 25(4):47-54. PubMed ID: 17135151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hello, and two great tricks.
    Schreibman KL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):1017-8. PubMed ID: 11641160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The two by two diagram: a graphical truth table.
    Johnson KM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1999 Nov; 52(11):1073-82. PubMed ID: 10527001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Glaucoma diagnostics.
    Geimer SA
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correctly using sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values in clinical practice: how to avoid three common pitfalls.
    Naeger DM; Kohi MP; Webb EM; Phelps A; Ordovas KG; Newman TB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jun; 200(6):W566-70. PubMed ID: 23701086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value].
    Faller H
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2005 Feb; 44(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 15668851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.