These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24951225)
41. Tips for giving a memorable presentation, Part IV: Using and composing PowerPoint slides. Harolds JA Clin Nucl Med; 2012 Oct; 37(10):977-80. PubMed ID: 22899205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a test. Main information indices]. Landais P; Besson C; Jais JP J Radiol; 1995; 76(2-3):I-X. PubMed ID: 7714857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Measurements of diagnostic examination performance using quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the preoperative evaluation of tumor grade in cerebral gliomas. Server A; Kulle B; Gadmar ØB; Josefsen R; Kumar T; Nakstad PH Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 20708868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Display monitors for digital medical imaging. Andriole KP J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jun; 2(6):543-6. PubMed ID: 17411873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Use of statistical analysis in the AJR and Radiology: frequency, methods, and subspecialty differences. Elster AD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):711-5. PubMed ID: 8079874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Diagnostic characteristics of tests: sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios. Carneiro AV Rev Port Cardiol; 2011 May; 30(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 21800483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Improving the diagnosis of bipolar disorder: predictive value of screening tests. Phelps JR; Ghaemi SN J Affect Disord; 2006 Jun; 92(2-3):141-8. PubMed ID: 16529822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Verification bias an underrecognized source of error in assessing the efficacy of medical imaging. Petscavage JM; Richardson ML; Carr RB Acad Radiol; 2011 Mar; 18(3):343-6. PubMed ID: 21145764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Plot your data. Roberts S Nutrition; 2009 May; 25(5):608-11. PubMed ID: 19278831 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Practical guide to choosing an appropriate data display. Paniello RC; Neely JG; Rich JT; Slattery EL; Voelker CC Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Dec; 145(6):886-94. PubMed ID: 21975544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. New discoveries of image display size on observer performance. Gao J Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):407-8. PubMed ID: 16554218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. The concepts and practice of statistics. Part 3--Graphics. McLean AL Aust Orthod J; 1987 Mar; 10(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 2446595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Digital image processing. Seeram E Radiol Technol; 2004; 75(6):435-52; quiz 453-5. PubMed ID: 15352557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Test Characteristics. How good is that test? Hagen MD Prim Care; 1995 Jun; 22(2):213-33. PubMed ID: 7617782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Predictive values of the usual biologic tests for the detection of human immunodeficiency virus infection. Consequences for screening]. Grémy F; Salmi LR Bull Acad Natl Med; 1995 Feb; 179(2):317-31; discussion 331-3. PubMed ID: 7614061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The use of computer technology to improve the effectiveness of orthopaedic presentations. Russell JA; Fincher AL; Woods GW Instr Course Lect; 1997; 46():595-610. PubMed ID: 9144002 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Appropriate use of predictive values in clinical decision making and evaluating diagnostic tests for TMD. Levitt SR; McKinney MW J Orofac Pain; 1994; 8(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 7812228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. What you need to know about statistics Part I: validity of diagnostic and screening tests. Thomas RL; Zidan MA; Slovis TL Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Feb; 45(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 25636704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]