480 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24951614)
21. Sonographic characteristics of breast cancers detected by supplemental screening US: Comparison with breast cancers seen on screening mammography.
Cho N; Moon WK; Chang JM; Yi A; Koo HR; Han BK
Acta Radiol; 2010 Nov; 51(9):969-76. PubMed ID: 20942730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reassessment and Follow-Up Results of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected on Screening Breast Ultrasound.
Chae EY; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ; Kim HH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Mar; 206(3):666-72. PubMed ID: 26901026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Identifying women with dense breasts at high risk for interval cancer: a cohort study.
Kerlikowske K; Zhu W; Tosteson AN; Sprague BL; Tice JA; Lehman CD; Miglioretti DL;
Ann Intern Med; 2015 May; 162(10):673-81. PubMed ID: 25984843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The connecticut experiment: the role of ultrasound in the screening of women with dense breasts.
Weigert J; Steenbergen S
Breast J; 2012; 18(6):517-22. PubMed ID: 23009208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study.
Skaane P; Gullien R; Eben EB; Sandhaug M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Stoeblen F
Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 24682405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of Mammography and Mammography with Supplemental Whole-Breast US Tomography for Cancer Detection in Patients with Dense Breasts.
Yamashita MW; Larsen LH; Perez J; Edwards AV; Papaioannou J; Jiang Y
Radiology; 2024 Jun; 311(3):e231680. PubMed ID: 38888480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breasts: Reader Study of Mammography-Negative and Mammography-Positive Cancers.
Giger ML; Inciardi MF; Edwards A; Papaioannou J; Drukker K; Jiang Y; Brem R; Brown JB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1341-50. PubMed ID: 27043979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Sensitivity of imaging for multifocal-multicentric breast carcinoma.
Bozzini A; Renne G; Meneghetti L; Bandi G; Santos G; Vento AR; Menna S; Andrighetto S; Viale G; Cassano E; Bellomi M
BMC Cancer; 2008 Sep; 8():275. PubMed ID: 18826585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Outcomes of Return to Routine Screening for BI-RADS 3 Lesions Detected at Supplemental Automated Whole-Breast Ultrasound in Women With Dense Breasts: A Prospective Study.
Barr RG; DeSivestri A; Golatta M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Dec; 217(6):1313-1321. PubMed ID: 34259039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Supplemental Screening Breast US in Women with Negative Mammographic Findings: Effect of Routine Axillary Scanning.
Lee SH; Yi A; Jang MJ; Chang JM; Cho N; Moon WK
Radiology; 2018 Mar; 286(3):830-837. PubMed ID: 29083988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Utility of supplemental screening with breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with dense breast tissue who are not at high risk for breast cancer.
Klevos GA; Collado-Mesa F; Net JM; Yepes MM
Indian J Radiol Imaging; 2017; 27(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 28515586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Value of the US BI-RADS final assessment following mastectomy: BI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions.
Gweon HM; Son EJ; Youk JH; Kim JA; Chung J
Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 22302210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Improving breast cancer detection using ultrasonography in asymptomatic women with non-fatty breast density.
Korpraphong P; Limsuwarn P; Tangcharoensathien W; Ansusingha T; Thephamongkhol K; Chuthapisith S
Acta Radiol; 2014 Oct; 55(8):903-8. PubMed ID: 24103915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue.
Kaplan SS
Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):641-9. PubMed ID: 11719658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Characteristics of breast cancers detected by ultrasound screening in women with negative mammograms.
Bae MS; Han W; Koo HR; Cho N; Chang JM; Yi A; Park IA; Noh DY; Choi WS; Moon WK
Cancer Sci; 2011 Oct; 102(10):1862-7. PubMed ID: 21752153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Follow-up interval for probably benign breast lesions on screening ultrasound in women at average risk for breast cancer with dense breasts.
Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Yoon JH; Kim EK
Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1045-1050. PubMed ID: 29231050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of Cancer Yields and Diagnostic Performance of Screening Mammography vs. Supplemental Screening Ultrasound in 4394 Women with Average Risk for Breast Cancer.
Moon HJ; Jung I; Park SJ; Kim MJ; Youk JH; Kim EK
Ultraschall Med; 2015 Jun; 36(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 24764212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Women With Intermediate Breast Cancer Risk and Dense Breasts.
Sorin V; Yagil Y; Yosepovich A; Shalmon A; Gotlieb M; Neiman OH; Sklair-Levy M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):W267-W274. PubMed ID: 30240292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dedicated dual-head gamma imaging for breast cancer screening in women with mammographically dense breasts.
Rhodes DJ; Hruska CB; Phillips SW; Whaley DH; O'Connor MK
Radiology; 2011 Jan; 258(1):106-18. PubMed ID: 21045179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
