These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24952317)

  • 1. Hide and vanish: data sets where the most parsimonious tree is known but hard to find, and their implications for tree search methods.
    Goloboff PA
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Oct; 79():118-31. PubMed ID: 24952317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is homoplasy or lineage sorting the source of incongruent mtdna and nuclear gene trees in the stiff-tailed ducks (Nomonyx-Oxyura)?
    McCracken K; Sorenson M
    Syst Biol; 2005 Feb; 54(1):35-55. PubMed ID: 15805009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hide and seek: placing and finding an optimal tree for thousands of homoplasy-rich sequences.
    Radel D; Sand A; Steel M
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2013 Dec; 69(3):1186-9. PubMed ID: 23939134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parsimony analysis of phylogenomic datasets (II): evaluation of PAUP*, MEGA and MPBoot.
    Goloboff PA; Catalano SA; Torres A
    Cladistics; 2022 Feb; 38(1):126-146. PubMed ID: 35049082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bias in tree searches and its consequences for measuring group supports.
    Goloboff PA; Simmons MP
    Syst Biol; 2014 Nov; 63(6):851-61. PubMed ID: 25074580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changing the landscape: a new strategy for estimating large phylogenies.
    Quicke DL; Taylor J; Purvis A
    Syst Biol; 2001 Feb; 50(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 12116594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Towards improving searches for optimal phylogenies.
    Ford E; St John K; Wheeler WC
    Syst Biol; 2015 Jan; 64(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 25164916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On divide-and-conquer strategies for parsimony analysis of large data sets: Rec-I-DCM3 versus TNT.
    Goloboff PA; Pol D
    Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):485-95. PubMed ID: 17562472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Increasing the efficiency of searches for the maximum likelihood tree in a phylogenetic analysis of up to 150 nucleotide sequences.
    Morrison DA
    Syst Biol; 2007 Dec; 56(6):988-1010. PubMed ID: 18066931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The gene tree delusion.
    Springer MS; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):1-33. PubMed ID: 26238460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On defining a unique phylogenetic tree with homoplastic characters.
    Goloboff PA; Wilkinson M
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2018 May; 122():95-101. PubMed ID: 29407481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Parsimony Ratchet, a New Method for Rapid Parsimony Analysis.
    Nixon KC
    Cladistics; 1999 Dec; 15(4):407-414. PubMed ID: 34902938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterizing the phylogenetic tree-search problem.
    Money D; Whelan S
    Syst Biol; 2012 Mar; 61(2):228-39. PubMed ID: 22076302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why Do Phylogenomic Data Sets Yield Conflicting Trees? Data Type Influences the Avian Tree of Life more than Taxon Sampling.
    Reddy S; Kimball RT; Pandey A; Hosner PA; Braun MJ; Hackett SJ; Han KL; Harshman J; Huddleston CJ; Kingston S; Marks BD; Miglia KJ; Moore WS; Sheldon FH; Witt CC; Yuri T; Braun EL
    Syst Biol; 2017 Sep; 66(5):857-879. PubMed ID: 28369655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phylogenetic supermatrix analysis of GenBank sequences from 2228 papilionoid legumes.
    McMahon MM; Sanderson MJ
    Syst Biol; 2006 Oct; 55(5):818-36. PubMed ID: 17060202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Representation in stochastic search for phylogenetic tree reconstruction.
    Weber G; Ohno-Machado L; Shieber S
    J Biomed Inform; 2006 Feb; 39(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 16359929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Limitations of locally sampled characters in phylogenetic analyses of sparse supermatrices.
    Simmons MP
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 May; 74():1-14. PubMed ID: 24530637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating trees from filtered data: identifiability of models for morphological phylogenetics.
    Allman ES; Holder MT; Rhodes JA
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Mar; 263(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 20004210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficiencies of fast algorithms of phylogenetic inference under the criteria of maximum parsimony, minimum evolution, and maximum likelihood when a large number of sequences are used.
    Takahashi K; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2000 Aug; 17(8):1251-8. PubMed ID: 10908645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The most parsimonious tree for random data.
    Fischer M; Galla M; Herbst L; Steel M
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Nov; 80():165-8. PubMed ID: 25079136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.