These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

439 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24953193)

  • 1. Clinical vignettes improve performance in anatomy practical assessment.
    Ikah DS; Finn GM; Swamy M; White PM; McLachlan JC
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 24953193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using generalizability analysis to estimate parameters for anatomy assessments: A multi-institutional study.
    Byram JN; Seifert MF; Brooks WS; Fraser-Cotlin L; Thorp LE; Williams JM; Wilson AB
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):109-119. PubMed ID: 27458988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The integrated anatomy practical paper: A robust assessment method for anatomy education today.
    Smith CF; McManus B
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 24706567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring the impact of the flipped anatomy classroom: The importance of categorizing an assessment by Bloom's taxonomy.
    Morton DA; Colbert-Getz JM
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):170-175. PubMed ID: 27427860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is a picture worth a thousand words: an analysis of the difficulty and discrimination parameters of illustrated vs. text-alone vignettes in histology multiple choice questions.
    Holland J; O'Sullivan R; Arnett R
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Oct; 15():184. PubMed ID: 26502882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Student performance on practical gross anatomy examinations is not affected by assessment modality.
    Meyer AJ; Innes SI; Stomski NJ; Armson AJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016; 9(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 25981194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of images on item statistics in multiple choice anatomy examinations.
    Notebaert AJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jan; 10(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 27472765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of alternating dissection on student performance in a medical anatomy course: are dissection videos an effective substitute for actual dissection?
    Granger NA; Calleson D
    Clin Anat; 2007 Apr; 20(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 16795027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating dissection in the gross anatomy course: Correlation between quality of laboratory dissection and students outcomes.
    Nwachukwu C; Lachman N; Pawlina W
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 24799441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The weak relationship between anatomy competence and clinical skills in junior medical students.
    Schoeman S; Chandratilake M
    Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(4):217-24. PubMed ID: 22467202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Positive impact of a master of science in applied anatomy program on USMLE Step 1 performance.
    Fredieu JR; Snyder CW
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 24733725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Participation in Dissection Affects Student Performance on Gross Anatomy Practical and Written Examinations: Results of a Four-Year Comparative Study.
    Thompson AR; Marshall AM
    Anat Sci Educ; 2020 Jan; 13(1):30-36. PubMed ID: 30661304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-evaluation in clinical anatomy: a practical application of item response theory in multiple choice examinations.
    Severo M; Tavares MA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 19924785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of curricular change on medical students' knowledge of anatomy.
    McKeown PP; Heylings DJ; Stevenson M; McKelvey KJ; Nixon JR; McCluskey DR
    Med Educ; 2003 Nov; 37(11):954-61. PubMed ID: 14629407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of anatomical knowledge by practical examinations: The effect of question design on student performance.
    Sagoo MG; Smith CF; Gosden E
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Oct; 9(5):446-52. PubMed ID: 26840187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of a method for measuring medical students' critical reflections on professionalism in gross anatomy.
    Wittich CM; Pawlina W; Drake RL; Szostek JH; Reed DA; Lachman N; McBride JM; Mandrekar JN; Beckman TJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 23212713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Student perception of a new integrated anatomy practical program: does students' prior learning make a difference?
    Tedman RA; Alexander H; Massa H; Moses D
    Clin Anat; 2011 Jul; 24(5):664-70. PubMed ID: 21438022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Higher-Order Assessment in Gross Anatomy: A Comparison of Performance on Higher- Versus Lower-Order Anatomy Questions between Undergraduate and First-Year Medical Students.
    Thompson AR; Giffin BF
    Anat Sci Educ; 2021 May; 14(3):306-316. PubMed ID: 33113274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving Medical Students' Application of Knowledge and Clinical Decision-Making Through a Porcine-Based Integrated Cardiac Basic Science Program.
    Stott MC; Gooseman MR; Briffa NP
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(4):675-81. PubMed ID: 27259397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implications of introducing case based radiological images in anatomy on teaching, learning and assessment of medical students: a mixed-methods study.
    Rathan R; Hamdy H; Kassab SE; Salama MNF; Sreejith A; Gopakumar A
    BMC Med Educ; 2022 Oct; 22(1):723. PubMed ID: 36242009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.