149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24953244)
1. Assessment of cone beam CT registration for prostate radiation therapy: fiducial marker and soft tissue methods.
Deegan T; Owen R; Holt T; Fielding A; Biggs J; Parfitt M; Coates A; Roberts L
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Feb; 59(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 24953244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the accuracy of the XVI dual registration tool compared with manual soft tissue matching to localise tumour volumes for post-prostatectomy patients receiving radiotherapy.
Campbell A; Owen R; Brown E; Pryor D; Bernard A; Lehman M
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Aug; 59(4):527-534. PubMed ID: 26109083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The potential failure risk of the cone-beam computed tomography-based planning target volume margin definition for prostate image-guided radiotherapy based on a prospective single-institutional hybrid analysis.
Hirose K; Sato M; Hatayama Y; Kawaguchi H; Komai F; Sohma M; Obara H; Suzuki M; Tanaka M; Fujioka I; Ichise K; Takai Y; Aoki M
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Jun; 13(1):106. PubMed ID: 29880006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Observer uncertainties of soft tissue-based patient positioning in IGRT.
Hirose TA; Arimura H; Fukunaga JI; Ohga S; Yoshitake T; Shioyama Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 31957964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is it essential to use fiducial markers during cone-beam CT-based radiotherapy for prostate cancer patients?
Yildirim BA; Onal C; Dolek Y
Jpn J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 27730453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostate positioning using cone-beam computer tomography based on manual soft-tissue registration: interobserver agreement between radiation oncologists and therapists.
Jereczek-Fossa BA; Pobbiati C; Santoro L; Fodor C; Fanti P; Vigorito S; Baroni G; Zerini D; De Cobelli O; Orecchia R
Strahlenther Onkol; 2014 Jan; 190(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 23949643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of gold fiducial marker manual localisation for magnetic resonance-only prostate radiotherapy.
Maspero M; Seevinck PR; Willems NJW; Sikkes GG; de Kogel GJ; de Boer HCJ; van der Voort van Zyp JRN; van den Berg CAT
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Jun; 13(1):105. PubMed ID: 29871656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of implanted gold fiducial markers with MV-CBCT image-guided IMRT for pancreatic tumours.
Packard M; Gayou O; Gurram K; Weiss B; Thakkar S; Kirichenko A
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Aug; 59(4):499-506. PubMed ID: 25754023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interobserver variability of radiation therapists aligning to fiducial markers for prostate radiation therapy.
Deegan T; Owen R; Holt T; Roberts L; Biggs J; McCarthy A; Parfitt M; Fielding A
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2013 Aug; 57(4):519-23; quiz 524-5. PubMed ID: 23870354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for prostate cancer comparing kV imaging of fiducial markers with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Barney BM; Lee RJ; Handrahan D; Welsh KT; Cook JT; Sause WT
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 May; 80(1):301-5. PubMed ID: 20864274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of the three degrees-of-freedom fiducial marker-based setup compared to soft tissue-based setup in hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Tanabe S; Utsunomiya S; Abe E; Sato H; Ohta A; Sakai H; Yamada T; Kaidu M; Aoyama H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):53-59. PubMed ID: 31054217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of computed tomography image quality on image-guided radiation therapy based on soft tissue registration.
Morrow NV; Lawton CA; Qi XS; Li XA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Apr; 82(5):e733-8. PubMed ID: 22349041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of kV cone-beam ct performance for prostate IGRT: a comparison of automatic grey-value alignment to implanted fiducial-marker alignment.
Shi W; Li JG; Zlotecki RA; Yeung A; Newlin H; Palta J; Liu C; Chvetsov AV; Olivier K
Am J Clin Oncol; 2011 Feb; 34(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 21189455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. PTV margin definition in hypofractionated IGRT of localized prostate cancer using cone beam CT and orthogonal image pairs with fiducial markers.
Oehler C; Lang S; Dimmerling P; Bolesch C; Kloeck S; Tini A; Glanzmann C; Najafi Y; Studer G; Zwahlen DR
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Nov; 9():229. PubMed ID: 25384898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A feature alignment score for online cone-beam CT-based image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Hargrave C; Deegan T; Poulsen M; Bednarz T; Harden F; Mengersen K
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):2898-2911. PubMed ID: 29772077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of rectal distension on prostate CBCT-based positioning assessed with 6 degrees-of-freedom couch.
Charret J; Salleron J; Quivrin M; Mazoyer F; Lesueur P; Martin E; Peiffert D; Créhange G
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2018; 8(5):e322-e328. PubMed ID: 29706305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are cone beam CT image matching skills transferrable from planning CT to planning MRI for MR-only prostate radiotherapy?
Brooks RL; McCallum HM; Pearson RA; Pilling K; Wyatt J
Br J Radiol; 2021 Jul; 94(1123):20210146. PubMed ID: 33914617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between manual and automatic image registration in image-guided radiation therapy using megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography with an imaging beam line for prostate cancer.
Hashido T; Nakasone S; Fukao M; Ota S; Inoue S
Radiol Phys Technol; 2018 Dec; 11(4):392-405. PubMed ID: 30242570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of prostate positioning guided by three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound and cone beam CT.
Li M; Ballhausen H; Hegemann NS; Reiner M; Tritschler S; Gratzke C; Manapov F; Corradini S; Ganswindt U; Belka C
Strahlenther Onkol; 2017 Mar; 193(3):221-228. PubMed ID: 27928626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of radiographer interobserver image registration variability using cone beam CT and MR for cervix radiotherapy.
Rodgers J; Hales R; Whiteside L; Parker J; McHugh L; Cree A; van Herk M; Choudhury A; Hoskin P; McWilliam A; Eccles CL
Br J Radiol; 2020 Aug; 93(1112):20200169. PubMed ID: 32543946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
