116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24954553)
1. Evidence of a relational spatial strategy in learning the centre of enclosures in human children (Homo sapiens).
Tommasi L; Giuliano A
Behav Processes; 2014 Jul; 106():172-9. PubMed ID: 24954553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Generalization in place learning and geometry knowledge in rats.
Tommasi L; Thinus-Blanc C
Learn Mem; 2004; 11(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 15054130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Generalization in place learning across geometrically different environments is impaired by hippocampal lesions in rats.
Tommasi L; Save E
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2005 Jul; 84(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15936678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multiple landmarks, the encoding of environmental geometry and the spatial logics of a dual brain.
Chiesa AD; Pecchia T; Tommasi L; Vallortigara G
Anim Cogn; 2006 Oct; 9(4):281-93. PubMed ID: 16941155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatial reorientation: the effects of space size on the encoding of landmark and geometry information.
Chiandetti C; Regolin L; Sovrano VA; Vallortigara G
Anim Cogn; 2007 Apr; 10(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 17136416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of reversible deactivation of mossy fibers in the dentate-CA3 system on geometric center detection task in mice: Functional separation of spatial learning and its generalization to new environment.
Inoue N; Watanabe S
Physiol Behav; 2014 May; 131():75-80. PubMed ID: 24732418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Encoding of relative enclosure size in a dynamic three-dimensional virtual environment by humans.
Sturz BR; Kelly DM
Behav Processes; 2009 Oct; 82(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 19576273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enclosure shape influences cue competition effects and goal location learning.
Wilson PN; Alexander T
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1552-67. PubMed ID: 20119881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Size does not matter, but features do: Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana) weigh features more heavily than geometry in large and small enclosures.
Lambinet V; Wilzeck C; Kelly DM
Behav Processes; 2014 Feb; 102():3-11. PubMed ID: 24378211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Environmental scaling influences the use of local but not global geometric cues during spatial reorientation.
Sturz BR; Bell ZK; Bodily KD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1159-1166. PubMed ID: 29239623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mice recognize the center of an enclosure.
Inoue N; Watanabe S
Behav Processes; 2012 Oct; 91(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 22772396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeling the effects of enclosure size on geometry learning.
Miller N
Behav Processes; 2009 Mar; 80(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 20522319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Young chickens learn to localize the centre of a spatial environment.
Tommasi L; Vallortigara G; Zanforlin M
J Comp Physiol A; 1997 May; 180(5):567-72. PubMed ID: 9163931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Orientation in trapezoid-shaped enclosures: implications for theoretical accounts of geometry learning.
Sturz BR; Gurley T; Bodily KD
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):246-53. PubMed ID: 21319918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatial cognition based on geometry and landmarks in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus).
Chiesa AD; Speranza M; Tommasi L; Vallortigara G
Behav Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 175(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 16979247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experience and geometry: controlled-rearing studies with chicks.
Chiandetti C; Vallortigara G
Anim Cogn; 2010 May; 13(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 19960217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The geometric module in the rat: independence of shape and feature learning in a food finding task.
Wall PL; Botly LC; Black CK; Shettleworth SJ
Learn Behav; 2004 Aug; 32(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 15672824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hemispheric processing of landmark and geometric information in male and female domestic chicks (Gallus gallus).
Tommasi L; Vallortigara G
Behav Brain Res; 2004 Nov; 155(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 15325782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incidental encoding of enclosure geometry does not require visual input: evidence from blindfolded adults.
Sturz BR; Gaskin KA; Roberts JE
Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):935-42. PubMed ID: 24733363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reorienting when cues conflict: A role for information content in spatial learning?
Sturz BR; Diemer SM
Behav Processes; 2010 Jan; 83(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 19903512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
