These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24955410)

  • 1. Optimal energy consumption analysis of natural gas pipeline.
    Liu E; Li C; Yang Y
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():506138. PubMed ID: 24955410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Research on the optimal energy consumption of oil pipeline.
    Liu E; Li C; Yang L; Liu S; Wu M; Wang D
    J Environ Biol; 2015 Jul; 36 Spec No():703-11. PubMed ID: 26387343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A model for booster station matching of gas turbine and gas compressor power under different ambient conditions.
    Tukur N; Osigwe EO
    Heliyon; 2021 Jun; 7(6):e07222. PubMed ID: 34195398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frost Heaving Damage Mechanism of a Buried Natural Gas Pipeline in a River and Creek Region.
    Su W; Huang S
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Aug; 15(16):. PubMed ID: 36013928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A pilot study to assess residential noise exposure near natural gas compressor stations.
    Boyle MD; Soneja S; Quirós-Alcalá L; Dalemarre L; Sapkota AR; Sangaramoorthy T; Wilson S; Milton D; Sapkota A
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0174310. PubMed ID: 28369113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding Variability To Reduce the Energy and GHG Footprints of U.S. Ethylene Production.
    Yao Y; Graziano DJ; Riddle M; Cresko J; Masanet E
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Dec; 49(24):14704-16. PubMed ID: 26523461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Energy Saving Benefit Analysis of the Compressor Short-Stop Adjustment Method Based on TGNET.
    Fulin K; Yuxin L; Tong L; Wang L; Yinan Q
    ACS Omega; 2021 Nov; 6(44):29921-29931. PubMed ID: 34778664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PRCI ambient NO
    Panek JA; McCarthy JM; Huth AZ; Krol AJ; Nowak C
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2020 May; 70(5):504-521. PubMed ID: 32186474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing fugitive emissions of CH
    Boothroyd IM; Almond S; Worrall F; Davies RK; Davies RJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Aug; 631-632():1638-1648. PubMed ID: 29555117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-throughput sequencing approach in analysis of microbial communities colonizing natural gas pipelines.
    Staniszewska A; Kunicka-Styczyńska A; Otlewska A; Gawor J; Gromadka R; Żuchniewicz K; Ziemiński K
    Microbiologyopen; 2019 Aug; 8(8):e00806. PubMed ID: 30729757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Service Reliability Test Method for Anticorrosion Coatings on the Compressor Outlet Pipelines of Natural Gas Stations.
    Nie H; Ma W; Deng K; Zhao G; Mao Y; Ren J; Dang W; Wang K; Cao J; Yao T; Liang X
    ACS Omega; 2023 Feb; 8(7):6402-6410. PubMed ID: 36844554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Push Force Analysis of Anchor Block of the Oil and Gas Pipeline in a Single-Slope Tunnel Based on the Energy Balance Method.
    Yan Y; Zhang L; Yan X
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150964. PubMed ID: 26963097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Controlling the pressure of hydrogen-natural gas mixture in an inclined pipeline.
    Chaharborj SS; Amin N
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0228955. PubMed ID: 32106248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematically Incorporating Environmental Objectives into Shale Gas Pipeline Development: A Binary Integer, Multiobjective Spatial Optimization Model.
    Kroetz K; Shih JS; Siikamäki JV; Marianov V; Krupnick A; Chu Z
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Jun; 53(12):7155-7162. PubMed ID: 31050415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A method for simulating the release of natural gas from the rupture of high-pressure pipelines in any terrain.
    Deng Y; Hu H; Yu B; Sun D; Hou L; Liang Y
    J Hazard Mater; 2018 Jan; 342():418-428. PubMed ID: 28854394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Air Emissions from Natural Gas Facilities in New York State.
    Russo PN; Carpenter DO
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 May; 16(9):. PubMed ID: 31067657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mixed Integer Linear Programming Optimization of Gas Supply to a Local Market.
    Mikolajková M; Saxén H; Pettersson F
    Ind Eng Chem Res; 2018 May; 57(17):5951-5965. PubMed ID: 30270973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Natural gas and CO
    Ulvestad M; Overland I
    Int J Environ Stud; 2012 Jun; 69(3):407-426. PubMed ID: 24683269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating natural gas emissions from underground pipelines using surface concentration measurements
    Cho Y; Ulrich BA; Zimmerle DJ; Smits KM
    Environ Pollut; 2020 Dec; 267():115514. PubMed ID: 33254704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Natural Gas Gathering and Transmission Pipelines and Social Vulnerability in the United States.
    Emanuel RE; Caretta MA; Rivers L; Vasudevan P
    Geohealth; 2021 Jun; 5(6):e2021GH000442. PubMed ID: 34189365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.