174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24955823)
1. Neurophysiological and behavioral responses of gypsy moth larvae to insect repellents: DEET, IR3535, and picaridin.
Sanford JL; Barski SA; Seen CM; Dickens JC; Shields VD
PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99924. PubMed ID: 24955823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Generic insect repellent detector from the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.
Syed Z; Pelletier J; Flounders E; Chitolina RF; Leal WS
PLoS One; 2011 Mar; 6(3):e17705. PubMed ID: 21436880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lethal and behavioural effects of three synthetic repellents (DEET, IR3535 and KBR 3023) on Aedes aegypti mosquitoes in laboratory assays.
Licciardi S; Herve JP; Darriet F; Hougard JM; Corbel V
Med Vet Entomol; 2006 Sep; 20(3):288-93. PubMed ID: 17044879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Commonly Used Insect Repellents Hide Human Odors from Anopheles Mosquitoes.
Afify A; Betz JF; Riabinina O; Lahondère C; Potter CJ
Curr Biol; 2019 Nov; 29(21):3669-3680.e5. PubMed ID: 31630950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Formulations of deet, picaridin, and IR3535 applied to skin repel nymphs of the lone star tick (Acari: Ixodidae) for 12 hours.
Carroll JF; Benante JP; Kramer M; Lohmeyer KH; Lawrence K
J Med Entomol; 2010 Jul; 47(4):699-704. PubMed ID: 20695288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Insecticidal and Behavioral Avoidance Responses of Anopheles minimus and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) to Three Synthetic Repellents.
Boonyuan W; Sathantriphop S; Tainchum K; Muenworn V; Prabaripai A; Bangs MJ; Chareonviriyaphap T
J Med Entomol; 2017 Sep; 54(5):1312-1322. PubMed ID: 28419272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bitter-sensitive gustatory receptor neuron responds to chemically diverse insect repellents in the common malaria mosquito Anopheles quadrimaculatus.
Sparks JT; Dickens JC
Naturwissenschaften; 2016 Jun; 103(5-6):39. PubMed ID: 27108454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Susceptibility of Dermacentor reticulatus tick to repellents containing different active ingrediens.
Gliniewicz A; Borecka A; Przygodzka M; Mikulak E
Przegl Epidemiol; 2019; 73(1):117-125. PubMed ID: 31134780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determination of antimicrobial properties of picaridin and DEET against a broad range of microorganisms.
Kalaycı S; Demirci S; Sahin F
World J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2014 Feb; 30(2):407-11. PubMed ID: 23933806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repellent and deterrent effects of SS220, Picaridin, and Deet suppress human blood feeding by Aedes aegypti, Anopheles stephensi, and Phlebotomus papatasi.
Klun JA; Khrimian A; Debboun M
J Med Entomol; 2006 Jan; 43(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 16506445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Odorant receptor modulation: ternary paradigm for mode of action of insect repellents.
Bohbot JD; Dickens JC
Neuropharmacology; 2012 Apr; 62(5-6):2086-95. PubMed ID: 22269900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mosquito repellents for the traveller: does picaridin provide longer protection than DEET?
Goodyer L; Schofield S
J Travel Med; 2018 May; 25(suppl_1):S10-S15. PubMed ID: 29718433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Altered behavioral responses of Sindbis virus-infected Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) to DEET and non-DEET based insect repellents.
Qualls WA; Day JF; Xue RD; Bowers DF
Acta Trop; 2012 Jun; 122(3):284-90. PubMed ID: 22289669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. No effect of insect repellents on the behaviour of Lymnaea stagnalis at environmentally relevant concentrations.
Fink P; von Elert E
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Nov; 24(33):26120-26124. PubMed ID: 28944437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Field evaluation of repellent formulations against daytime and nighttime biting mosquitoes in a tropical rainforest in northern Australia.
Frances SP; Van Dung N; Beebe NW; Debboun M
J Med Entomol; 2002 May; 39(3):541-4. PubMed ID: 12061453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Insecticidal, acaricidal and repellent effects of DEET- and IR3535-impregnated bed nets using a novel long-lasting polymer-coating technique.
Faulde MK; Albiez G; Nehring O
Parasitol Res; 2010 Mar; 106(4):957-65. PubMed ID: 20162432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Infodisruption of inducible anti-predator defenses through commercial insect repellents?
von Elert E; Preuss K; Fink P
Environ Pollut; 2016 Mar; 210():18-26. PubMed ID: 26708758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mosquito odorant receptor for DEET and methyl jasmonate.
Xu P; Choo YM; De La Rosa A; Leal WS
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Nov; 111(46):16592-7. PubMed ID: 25349401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Insect repellents and contact urticaria: differential response to DEET and picaridin.
Shutty B; Swender D; Chernin L; Tcheurekdjian H; Hostoffer R
Cutis; 2013 Jun; 91(6):280-2. PubMed ID: 23837149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Field evaluations of topical arthropod repellents in North, Central, and South America.
Lawrence KL; Achee NL; Bernier UR; Mundal KD; Benante JP
J Med Entomol; 2014 Sep; 51(5):980-8. PubMed ID: 25276927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
