These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24955851)

  • 1. Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: a literature review and a novel methodology.
    Fitzgerald RJ; Oriet C; Price HL
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 24955851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.
    Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimizing the selection of fillers in police lineups.
    Colloff MF; Wilson BM; Seale-Carlisle TM; Wixted JT
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(8):. PubMed ID: 33593908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: an experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure.
    Wells GL; Steblay NK; Dysart JE
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 24933175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does filler database size influence identification accuracy?
    Bergold AN; Heaton P
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Jun; 42(3):227-243. PubMed ID: 29809026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using objective measures to examine the effect of suspect-filler similarity on eyewitness identification performance.
    McKinley GL; Peterson DJ
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Oct; 7(1):95. PubMed ID: 36271974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring lineup fairness from eyewitness identification data using a multinomial processing tree model.
    Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6290. PubMed ID: 37072473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling face similarity in police lineups.
    Shen KJ; Colloff MF; Vul E; Wilson BM; Wixted JT
    Psychol Rev; 2023 Mar; 130(2):432-461. PubMed ID: 36548056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phenotypic mismatch between suspects and fillers but not phenotypic bias increases eyewitness identifications of Black suspects.
    Jones JM; Katzman J; Kovera MB
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1233782. PubMed ID: 38680285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using objective measures to examine the effect of suspect-filler similarity on eyewitness identification performance.
    McKinley GL; Peterson DJ
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Nov; 8(1):68. PubMed ID: 37930437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the possible advantages of combining small lineups with instructions that discourage guessing-based selection.
    Therre A; Bell R; Menne NM; Mayer C; Lichtenhagen U; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):14126. PubMed ID: 38898071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why are lineups better than showups? A test of the filler siphoning and enhanced discriminability accounts.
    Colloff MF; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Mar; 26(1):124-143. PubMed ID: 30883151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison.
    Steblay N; Dysart J; Fulero S; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Oct; 27(5):523-40. PubMed ID: 14593796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of fillers on lineup performance.
    Wetmore SA; McAdoo RM; Gronlund SD; Neuschatz JS
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2017; 2(1):48. PubMed ID: 29214209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. fullROC: An R package for generating and analyzing eyewitness-lineup ROC curves.
    Yang Y; Smith AM
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Apr; 55(3):1259-1274. PubMed ID: 35641680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Memory strength and lineup presentation moderate effects of administrator influence on mistaken identifications.
    Zimmerman DM; Chorn JA; Rhead LM; Evelo AJ; Kovera MB
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Dec; 23(4):460-473. PubMed ID: 29265857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictors of eyewitness identification decisions from video lineups in England: a field study.
    Horry R; Memon A; Wright DB; Milne R
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Aug; 36(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 22849411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New signal detection theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups.
    Lee J; Penrod SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Oct; 43(5):436-454. PubMed ID: 31368723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lineup composition, suspect position, and the sequential lineup advantage.
    Carlson CA; Gronlund SD; Clark SE
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Jun; 14(2):118-128. PubMed ID: 18590368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selecting fillers on emotional appearance improves lineup identification accuracy.
    Flowe HD; Klatt T; Colloff MF
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Dec; 38(6):509-19. PubMed ID: 25133919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.