These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24955851)

  • 21. Eyewitness Identification Is a Visual Search Task.
    Wixted JT; Vul E; Mickes L; Wilson BM
    Annu Rev Vis Sci; 2021 Sep; 7():519-541. PubMed ID: 34270349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Selecting lineup foils in eyewitness identification experiments: experimental control and real-world simulation.
    Clark SE; Tunnicliff JL
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Jun; 25(3):199-216. PubMed ID: 11480800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Unfair Lineups Make Witnesses More Likely to Confuse Innocent and Guilty Suspects.
    Colloff MF; Wade KA; Strange D
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1227-39. PubMed ID: 27458070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effects of filler similarity and lineup size on eyewitness identification.
    Shen KJ; Huang J; Lam AL; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38573723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups.
    Wright DB
    Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimation of eyewitness error rates in fair and biased lineups.
    Fitzgerald RJ; Tredoux CG; Juncu S
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Aug; 47(4):463-483. PubMed ID: 37471013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimating the proportion of guilty suspects and posterior probability of guilt in lineups using signal-detection models.
    Cohen AL; Starns JJ; Rotello CM; Cataldo AM
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 May; 5(1):21. PubMed ID: 32405927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Backloading in the sequential lineup prevents within-lineup criterion shifts that undermine eyewitness identification performance.
    Horry R; Palmer MA; Brewer N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):346-60. PubMed ID: 22924858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The information gained from witnesses' responses to an initial "blank" lineup.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Oct; 36(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 22468758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of eyewitness memory: comparing the diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous versus sequential lineups.
    Mickes L; Flowe HD; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):361-76. PubMed ID: 23294282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The reveal procedure: A way to enhance evidence of innocence from police lineups.
    Yilmaz AS; Lebensfeld TC; Wilson BM
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 46(2):164-173. PubMed ID: 35084905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Distinguishing Between Investigator Discriminability and Eyewitness Discriminability: A Method for Creating Full Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves of Lineup Identification Performance.
    Smith AM; Yang Y; Wells GL
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 May; 15(3):589-607. PubMed ID: 32375014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Field experiments on eyewitness identification: towards a better understanding of pitfalls and prospects.
    Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Feb; 32(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 17610051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A validation of the two-high threshold eyewitness identification model by reanalyzing published data.
    Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2022 Aug; 12(1):13379. PubMed ID: 35927288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of exposure to multiple lineups on face identification accuracy.
    Hinz T; Pezdek K
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Apr; 25(2):185-98. PubMed ID: 11419382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Police lineups of the future?
    Brewer N; Weber N; Guerin N
    Am Psychol; 2020 Jan; 75(1):76-91. PubMed ID: 30998024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Creating fair lineups for suspects with distinctive features.
    Zarkadi T; Wade KA; Stewart N
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Dec; 20(12):1448-53. PubMed ID: 19883492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A signal-detection analysis of eyewitness identification across the adult lifespan.
    Colloff MF; Wade KA; Wixted JT; Maylor EA
    Psychol Aging; 2017 May; 32(3):243-258. PubMed ID: 28504536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Identifying the guilty word: Simultaneous versus sequential lineups for DRM word lists.
    Finley JR; Wixted JT; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Aug; 48(6):903-919. PubMed ID: 32222916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Lineup fairness: propitious heterogeneity and the diagnostic feature-detection hypothesis.
    Carlson CA; Jones AR; Whittington JE; Lockamyeir RF; Carlson MA; Wooten AR
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2019 Jun; 4(1):20. PubMed ID: 31197501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.