These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24956295)
1. Contrast-enhanced dual-energy mammography: a promising new imaging tool in breast cancer detection. Lalji U; Lobbes M Womens Health (Lond); 2014 May; 10(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 24956295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography in routine clinical practice in 2013. Badr S; Laurent N; Régis C; Boulanger L; Lemaille S; Poncelet E Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014 Mar; 95(3):245-58. PubMed ID: 24238816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low energy mammogram obtained in contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is comparable to routine full-field digital mammography (FFDM). Francescone MA; Jochelson MS; Dershaw DD; Sung JS; Hughes MC; Zheng J; Moskowitz C; Morris EA Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1350-5. PubMed ID: 24932846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of Dual-Energy Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography for Screening Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer. Sung JS; Lebron L; Keating D; D'Alessio D; Comstock CE; Lee CH; Pike MC; Ayhan M; Moskowitz CS; Morris EA; Jochelson MS Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):81-88. PubMed ID: 31453765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anatomical noise in contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Part I. Single-energy imaging. Hill ML; Mainprize JG; Carton AK; Muller S; Ebrahimi M; Jong RA; Dromain C; Yaffe MJ Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051910. PubMed ID: 23635280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: examination protocol. Barra FR; Ribeiro AC; Mathieu OD; Rodrigues AC Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014 Mar; 95(3):351-2. PubMed ID: 24581728 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Anatomical noise in contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Part II. Dual-energy imaging. Hill ML; Mainprize JG; Carton AK; Saab-Puong S; Iordache R; Muller S; Jong RA; Dromain C; Yaffe MJ Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081907. PubMed ID: 23927321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography: A Single-Institution Experience of the First 208 Cases. Lewis TC; Pizzitola VJ; Giurescu ME; Eversman WG; Lorans R; Robinson KA; Patel BK Breast J; 2017 Jan; 23(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 27696576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast enhanced dual energy spectral mammogram, an emerging addendum in breast imaging. Kariyappa KD; Gnanaprakasam F; Anand S; Krishnaswami M; Ramachandran M Br J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 89(1067):20150609. PubMed ID: 27610475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study. Dromain C; Thibault F; Diekmann F; Fallenberg EM; Jong RA; Koomen M; Hendrick RE; Tardivon A; Toledano A Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Jun; 14(3):R94. PubMed ID: 22697607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative loco-regional staging of invasive lobular carcinoma with contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM). Amato F; Bicchierai G; Cirone D; Depretto C; Di Naro F; Vanzi E; Scaperrotta G; Bartolotta TV; Miele V; Nori J Radiol Med; 2019 Dec; 124(12):1229-1237. PubMed ID: 31773458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced mammography. Travieso Aja MM; Rodríguez Rodríguez M; Alayón Hernández S; Vega Benítez V; Luzardo OP Radiologia; 2014; 56(5):390-9. PubMed ID: 25086679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis--Comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI. Chou CP; Lewin JM; Chiang CL; Hung BH; Yang TL; Huang JS; Liao JB; Pan HB Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2501-8. PubMed ID: 26456307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography: Technique, Clinical Applications, and Pitfalls. Polat DS; Evans WP; Dogan BE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Nov; 215(5):1267-1278. PubMed ID: 32877247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Technique and clinical applications of dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) in breast cancer evaluation: a pictorial essay. Sudhir R; Koppula V; Mandava A; Kamala S; Potlapalli A Diagn Interv Radiol; 2021 Jan; 27(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 33252334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analytical optimization of digital subtraction mammography with contrast medium using a commercial unit. Rosado-Méndez I; Palma BA; Brandan ME Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5544-57. PubMed ID: 19175112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Susceptibility of iodine concentration map of dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography for quantitative and tumor enhancement assessment. Hwang YS; Cheung YC; Lin YY; Hsu HL; Tsai HY Acta Radiol; 2018 Aug; 59(8):893-901. PubMed ID: 29117707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing tumor extent on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus full-field digital mammography and ultrasound. Patel BK; Garza SA; Eversman S; Lopez-Alvarez Y; Kosiorek H; Pockaj BA Clin Imaging; 2017; 46():78-84. PubMed ID: 28750354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]