These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24956937)

  • 1. Integration of existing systematic reviews into new reviews: identification of guidance needs.
    Robinson KA; Whitlock EP; Oneil ME; Anderson JK; Hartling L; Dryden DM; Butler M; Newberry SJ; McPheeters M; Berkman ND; Lin JS; Chang S
    Syst Rev; 2014 Jun; 3():60. PubMed ID: 24956937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Twelve recommendations for integrating existing systematic reviews into new reviews: EPC guidance.
    Robinson KA; Chou R; Berkman ND; Newberry SJ; Fu R; Hartling L; Dryden D; Butler M; Foisy M; Anderson J; Motu'apuaka M; Relevo R; Guise JM; Chang S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():38-44. PubMed ID: 26261004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations.
    Gomersall JS; Jadotte YT; Xue Y; Lockwood S; Riddle D; Preda A
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 26288063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary.
    Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Becker LA; Featherstone R; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):190. PubMed ID: 27842604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.
    Philips Z; Ginnelly L; Sculpher M; Claxton K; Golder S; Riemsma R; Woolacoot N; Glanville J
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Sep; 8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. PubMed ID: 15361314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of Cochrane Reviews: a mixed-methods evaluation of outputs from Cochrane Review Groups supported by the National Institute for Health Research.
    Bunn F; Trivedi D; Alderson P; Hamilton L; Martin A; Pinkney E; Iliffe S
    Health Technol Assess; 2015 Apr; 19(28):1-99, v-vi. PubMed ID: 25875129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An approach to addressing subpopulation considerations in systematic reviews: the experience of reviewers supporting the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Whitlock EP; Eder M; Thompson JH; Jonas DE; Evans CV; Guirguis-Blake JM; Lin JS
    Syst Rev; 2017 Mar; 6(1):41. PubMed ID: 28253915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.
    Munn Z; Peters MDJ; Stern C; Tufanaru C; McArthur A; Aromataris E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):143. PubMed ID: 30453902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies.
    Cooper C; Booth A; Varley-Campbell J; Britten N; Garside R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):85. PubMed ID: 30107788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
    Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Financial arrangements for health systems in low-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews.
    Wiysonge CS; Paulsen E; Lewin S; Ciapponi A; Herrera CA; Opiyo N; Pantoja T; Rada G; Oxman AD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Sep; 9(9):CD011084. PubMed ID: 28891235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conscious sedation guidance.
    Coulthard P
    Evid Based Dent; 2006; 7(4):90-1. PubMed ID: 17187034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): The Joanna Briggs Institute's approach.
    Moola S; Munn Z; Sears K; Sfetcu R; Currie M; Lisy K; Tufanaru C; Qureshi R; Mattis P; Mu P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26262566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews.
    Peters MD; Godfrey CM; Khalil H; McInerney P; Parker D; Soares CB
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 26134548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Guidance for overviews of reviews continues to accumulate, but important challenges remain: a scoping review.
    Gates M; Gates A; Guitard S; Pollock M; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2020 Nov; 9(1):254. PubMed ID: 33148319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consideration of health inequalities in systematic reviews: a mapping review of guidance.
    Maden M
    Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):202. PubMed ID: 27894332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.