These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2495706)

  • 1. A prospective trial of ionic vs nonionic contrast agents in routine clinical practice: comparison of adverse effects.
    Wolf GL; Arenson RL; Cross AP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 May; 152(5):939-44. PubMed ID: 2495706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of nonionic, low-osmolality radiocontrast agents with ionic, high-osmolality agents during cardiac catheterization.
    Barrett BJ; Parfrey PS; Vavasour HM; O'Dea F; Kent G; Stone E
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Feb; 326(7):431-6. PubMed ID: 1732770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A retrospective survey of delayed adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Yamaguchi K; Takanashi I; Kanauchi T; Hoshi T; Kubota H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Nov; 52(11):1565-70. PubMed ID: 1465338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acute and late adverse reactions to low-osmolal contrast media.
    Mikkonen R; Kontkanen T; Kivisaari L
    Acta Radiol; 1995 Jan; 36(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 7833173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adverse events after unenhanced and monomeric and dimeric contrast-enhanced CT: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Schild HH; Kuhl CK; Hübner-Steiner U; Böhm I; Speck U
    Radiology; 2006 Jul; 240(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 16720865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective use of low-osmolality contrast agents for i.v. urography and CT: safety and effect on cost.
    Hunter TB; Dye J; Duval JF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):965-8. PubMed ID: 8092044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Late reactions to a radiologic contrast media (Iopamidol-Bracco). Prospective study].
    Bartolucci F; Cecarini M; Gabrielli G; Abbiati R; Barberio M; Busilacchi P
    Radiol Med; 2000 Oct; 100(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 11155455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trends in adverse events after IV administration of contrast media.
    Cochran ST; Bomyea K; Sayre JW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Jun; 176(6):1385-8. PubMed ID: 11373197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Delayed hypersensitivity reaction after infusion of nonionic intravenous contrast material for an excretory urogram: a case report and review of the literature.
    Stovsky MD; Seftel AD; Resnick MI
    J Urol; 1995 May; 153(5):1641-3. PubMed ID: 7714996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of patient reactions and diagnostic quality for hysterosalpingography using ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Chen MY; Zagoria RJ; Fayez JA; Ott DJ; Van Swearingen FL
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Feb; 2(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 9419535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the rates of adverse drug reactions. Ionic contrast agents, ionic agents combined with steroids, and nonionic agents.
    Wolf GL; Mishkin MM; Roux SG; Halpern EF; Gottlieb J; Zimmerman J; Gillen J; Thellman C
    Invest Radiol; 1991 May; 26(5):404-10. PubMed ID: 2055736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acute renal dysfunction in high-risk patients after angiography: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Gomes AS; Lois JF; Baker JD; McGlade CT; Bunnell DH; Hartzman S
    Radiology; 1989 Jan; 170(1 Pt 1):65-8. PubMed ID: 2909121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Universal use of nonionic iodinated contrast medium for CT: evaluation of safety in a large urban teaching hospital.
    Mortelé KJ; Oliva MR; Ondategui S; Ros PR; Silverman SG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 15615946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of iohexol 300 and diatrizoate meglumine 60 for body CT: image quality, adverse reactions, and aborted/repeated examinations.
    Bernardino ME; Fishman EK; Jeffrey RB; Brown PC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):665-7. PubMed ID: 1739017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of contrast media on renal function in children: comparison of ionic and non-ionic agents.
    Buyan N; Arab M; Hasanoğlu E; Gökçora N; Ercan S
    Turk J Pediatr; 1995; 37(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 8560597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Contrast media in venous digital angiography: ionic or non-ionic?].
    Stacul F; Magnaldi S; Pozzi-Mucelli R; Muner G; Dalla Palma L
    Radiol Med; 1986 Nov; 72(11):815-22. PubMed ID: 3786845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Long-term results using a nonionic contrast medium--a report of clinical experiences].
    Hruby W; Stellamor K
    Rontgenblatter; 1987 Mar; 40(3):73-7. PubMed ID: 3576085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prevalence of acute reactions to iopromide: postmarketing surveillance study of 74,717 patients.
    Kopp AF; Mortele KJ; Cho YD; Palkowitsch P; Bettmann MA; Claussen CD
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Oct; 49(8):902-11. PubMed ID: 18651252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spiral CT with ionic and nonionic contrast material: evaluation of patient motion and scan quality.
    Stockberger SM; Hicklin JA; Liang Y; Wass JL; Ambrosius WT
    Radiology; 1998 Mar; 206(3):631-6. PubMed ID: 9494478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Asymptomatic blood pressure and pulse rate changes during intravenous urography. Ionic contrast media vs. nonionic contrast media].
    Miwa K
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Sep; 50(9):1082-6. PubMed ID: 2247349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.