363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24957400)
1. Cost-effectiveness and diagnostic effectiveness analyses of multiple algorithms for the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome.
Gould-Suarez M; El-Serag HB; Musher B; Franco LM; Chen GJ
Dig Dis Sci; 2014 Dec; 59(12):2913-26. PubMed ID: 24957400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A systematic review and economic evaluation of diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome.
Snowsill T; Huxley N; Hoyle M; Jones-Hughes T; Coelho H; Cooper C; Frayling I; Hyde C
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Sep; 18(58):1-406. PubMed ID: 25244061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Molecular testing for Lynch syndrome in people with colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.
Snowsill T; Coelho H; Huxley N; Jones-Hughes T; Briscoe S; Frayling IM; Hyde C
Health Technol Assess; 2017 Sep; 21(51):1-238. PubMed ID: 28895526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The predicted impact and cost-effectiveness of systematic testing of people with incident colorectal cancer for Lynch syndrome.
Kang YJ; Killen J; Caruana M; Simms K; Taylor N; Frayling IM; Snowsill T; Huxley N; Coupe VM; Hughes S; Freeman V; Boussioutas A; Trainer AH; Ward RL; Mitchell G; Macrae FA; Canfell K
Med J Aust; 2020 Feb; 212(2):72-81. PubMed ID: 31595523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative effectiveness of screening strategies for Lynch syndrome.
Barzi A; Sadeghi S; Kattan MW; Meropol NJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Apr; 107(4):. PubMed ID: 25794514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lynch syndrome screening in newly diagnosed colorectal cancer in general pathology practice: from the revised Bethesda guidelines to a universal approach.
Morrison J; Bronner M; Leach BH; Downs-Kelly E; Goldblum JR; Liu X
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2011 Nov; 46(11):1340-8. PubMed ID: 21879804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome in Italy.
Pastorino R; Basile M; Tognetto A; Di Marco M; Grossi A; Lucci-Cordisco E; Scaldaferri F; De Censi A; Federici A; Villari P; Genuardi M; Ricciardi W; Boccia S
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235038. PubMed ID: 32609729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The proportion of endometrial tumours associated with Lynch syndrome (PETALS): A prospective cross-sectional study.
Ryan NAJ; McMahon R; Tobi S; Snowsill T; Esquibel S; Wallace AJ; Bunstone S; Bowers N; Mosneag IE; Kitson SJ; O'Flynn H; Ramchander NC; Sivalingam VN; Frayling IM; Bolton J; McVey RJ; Evans DG; Crosbie EJ
PLoS Med; 2020 Sep; 17(9):e1003263. PubMed ID: 32941469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Genetic Testing Strategies for Lynch Syndrome in Taiwan.
Chen YE; Kao SS; Chung RH
PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160599. PubMed ID: 27482709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Strategies to identify the Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Ladabaum U; Wang G; Terdiman J; Blanco A; Kuppermann M; Boland CR; Ford J; Elkin E; Phillips KA
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(2):69-79. PubMed ID: 21768580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of Tumor Sequencing as a Replacement for Lynch Syndrome Screening and Current Molecular Tests for Patients With Colorectal Cancer.
Hampel H; Pearlman R; Beightol M; Zhao W; Jones D; Frankel WL; Goodfellow PJ; Yilmaz A; Miller K; Bacher J; Jacobson A; Paskett E; Shields PG; Goldberg RM; de la Chapelle A; Shirts BH; Pritchard CC;
JAMA Oncol; 2018 Jun; 4(6):806-813. PubMed ID: 29596542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bethesda criteria for microsatellite instability testing: impact on the detection of new cases of Lynch syndrome.
Serrano M; Lage P; Belga S; Filipe B; Francisco I; Rodrigues P; Fonseca R; Chaves P; Claro I; Albuquerque C; Pereira AD
Fam Cancer; 2012 Dec; 11(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 22776989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Universal Versus Targeted Screening for Lynch Syndrome: Comparing Ascertainment and Costs Based on Clinical Experience.
Erten MZ; Fernandez LP; Ng HK; McKinnon WC; Heald B; Koliba CJ; Greenblatt MS
Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Oct; 61(10):2887-2895. PubMed ID: 27384051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of screening strategies for Lynch syndrome in patients with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer: a prospective cohort study in China.
Chao X; Li L; Wu M; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Bi Y; Lang J
Cancer Commun (Lond); 2019 Jul; 39(1):42. PubMed ID: 31307542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Association of tumor morphology with mismatch-repair protein status in older endometrial cancer patients: implications for universal versus selective screening strategies for Lynch syndrome.
Rabban JT; Calkins SM; Karnezis AN; Grenert JP; Blanco A; Crawford B; Chen LM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Jun; 38(6):793-800. PubMed ID: 24503759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Population-Based Lynch Syndrome Screening by Microsatellite Instability in Patients ≤50: Prevalence, Testing Determinants, and Result Availability Prior to Colon Surgery.
Karlitz JJ; Hsieh MC; Liu Y; Blanton C; Schmidt B; Jessup JM; Wu XC; Chen VW
Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 110(7):948-55. PubMed ID: 25601013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance characteristics of screening strategies for Lynch syndrome in unselected women with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer who have undergone universal germline mutation testing.
Ferguson SE; Aronson M; Pollett A; Eiriksson LR; Oza AM; Gallinger S; Lerner-Ellis J; Alvandi Z; Bernardini MQ; MacKay HJ; Mojtahedi G; Tone AA; Massey C; Clarke BA
Cancer; 2014 Dec; 120(24):3932-9. PubMed ID: 25081409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of routine screening for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer patients up to 70 years of age.
Leenen CH; Goverde A; de Bekker-Grob EW; Wagner A; van Lier MG; Spaander MC; Bruno MJ; Tops CM; van den Ouweland AM; Dubbink HJ; Kuipers EJ; Dinjens WN; van Leerdam ME; Steyerberg EW
Genet Med; 2016 Oct; 18(10):966-73. PubMed ID: 26938782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility of screening for Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer.
Hampel H; Frankel WL; Martin E; Arnold M; Khanduja K; Kuebler P; Clendenning M; Sotamaa K; Prior T; Westman JA; Panescu J; Fix D; Lockman J; LaJeunesse J; Comeras I; de la Chapelle A
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Dec; 26(35):5783-8. PubMed ID: 18809606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of selection strategies for genetic testing of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma: effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.
Reyes CM; Allen BA; Terdiman JP; Wilson LS
Cancer; 2002 Nov; 95(9):1848-56. PubMed ID: 12404277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
