339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24957569)
1. Intermediate-length colonoscope needs more training duration than long-length colonoscope.
Kim YG; Kim KJ; Yang DH; Ye BD; Byeon JS; Myung SJ; Yang SK; Kim JH
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):1007-13. PubMed ID: 24957569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison on colonoscopic parameters according to length of adult-colonoscope.
Lee SH; Lee DJ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 24384429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long pediatric colonoscope versus intermediate length adult colonoscope for colonoscopy.
Hsieh YH; Zhou AL; Lin HJ
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jul; 23(7 Pt 2):e7-e10. PubMed ID: 18702687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.
DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Propofol sedation for colonoscopy with a new ultrathin or a standard endoscope: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Töx U; Schumacher B; Toermer T; Terheggen G; Mertens J; Holzapfel B; Lehmacher W; Goeser T; Neuhaus H
Endoscopy; 2013 Jun; 45(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 23468196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized controlled trial of comparison on time and rate of cecal and termianl Ileal intubation according to adult-colonoscope length: intermediate versus long.
Kim KM; Lee SH; Lee DJ; Kim KN; Seo SW; Lee HS; Lee DR
J Korean Med Sci; 2014 Jan; 29(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 24431912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the usefulness of a transparent hood attached to the tip of the colonoscope.
Kondo S; Yamaji Y; Watabe H; Yamada A; Sugimoto T; Ohta M; Ogura K; Okamoto M; Yoshida H; Kawabe T; Omata M
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Jan; 102(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 17100978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A retrograde-viewing device improves detection of adenomas in the colon: a prospective efficacy evaluation (with videos).
Waye JD; Heigh RI; Fleischer DE; Leighton JA; Gurudu S; Aldrich LB; Li J; Ramrakhiani S; Edmundowicz SA; Early DS; Jonnalagadda S; Bresalier RS; Kessler WR; Rex DK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):551-6. PubMed ID: 20018280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrathin versus pediatric instruments for colonoscopy in older female patients: A randomized trial.
Nemoto D; Utano K; Endo S; Isohata N; Hewett DG; Togashi K
Dig Endosc; 2017 Mar; 29(2):168-174. PubMed ID: 27859645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy according to lesion location and endoscopist training level.
Kim DJ; Kim HW; Park SB; Kang DH; Choi CW; Hong JB; Ji BH; Lee CS
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(20):6261-70. PubMed ID: 26034361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective randomized study of the use of an ultrathin colonoscope versus a pediatric colonoscope in sedation-optional colonoscopy.
Sato K; Ito S; Kitagawa T; Hirahata K; Hihara D; Tominaga K; Yasuda I; Maetani I
Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5150-5158. PubMed ID: 28488178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Colonoscope length and procedure efficiency.
Dickey W; Garrett D
Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Jan; 97(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 11808973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of adenoma detection and miss rates between a novel balloon colonoscope and standard colonoscopy: a randomized tandem study.
Halpern Z; Gross SA; Gralnek IM; Shpak B; Pochapin M; Hoffman A; Mizrahi M; Rochberger YS; Moshkowitz M; Santo E; Melhem A; Grinshpon R; Pfefer J; Kiesslich R
Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):238-44. PubMed ID: 25704662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of prescribed patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal on adenoma detection.
Ou G; Kim E; Lakzadeh P; Tong J; Enns R; Ramji A; Whittaker S; Ko HH; Bressler B; Halparin L; Lam E; Amar J; Telford J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):277-83. PubMed ID: 24629419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Expanding the view of a standard colonoscope with the Third Eye Panoramic cap.
Rubin M; Lurie L; Bose K; Kim SH
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Oct; 21(37):10683-7. PubMed ID: 26457029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.
Barclay RL; Vicari JJ; Doughty AS; Johanson JF; Greenlaw RL
N Engl J Med; 2006 Dec; 355(24):2533-41. PubMed ID: 17167136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Significance of colonoscope length in cecal insertion time.
Lee HL; Eun CS; Lee OY; Jeon YC; Han DS; Sohn JH; Yoon BC; Choi HS; Hahm JS; Lee MH; Lee DH; Moon W; Kim SY
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Mar; 69(3 Pt 1):503-8. PubMed ID: 19152904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial.
Fatima H; Rex DK; Rothstein R; Rahmani E; Nehme O; Dewitt J; Helper D; Toor A; Bensen S
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jan; 6(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 18065277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of cap-assisted colonoscopy on the learning curve and quality in colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
Tang Z; Zhang DS; Thrift AP; Patel KK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Mar; 87(3):723-732.e3. PubMed ID: 28648577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in comparison with regular colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
Lee YT; Lai LH; Hui AJ; Wong VW; Ching JY; Wong GL; Wu JC; Chan HL; Leung WK; Lau JY; Sung JJ; Chan FK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Jan; 104(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 19098847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
