217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24957886)
1. A multiparametric serum marker panel as a complementary test to mammography for the diagnosis of node-negative early-stage breast cancer and DCIS in young women.
Lacombe J; Mangé A; Bougnoux AC; Prassas I; Solassol J
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 Sep; 23(9):1834-42. PubMed ID: 24957886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identification of a new panel of serum autoantibodies associated with the presence of in situ carcinoma of the breast in younger women.
Desmetz C; Bascoul-Mollevi C; Rochaix P; Lamy PJ; Kramar A; Rouanet P; Maudelonde T; Mangé A; Solassol J
Clin Cancer Res; 2009 Jul; 15(14):4733-41. PubMed ID: 19584157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification and validation of new autoantibodies for the diagnosis of DCIS and node negative early-stage breast cancers.
Lacombe J; Mangé A; Jarlier M; Bascoul-Mollevi C; Rouanet P; Lamy PJ; Maudelonde T; Solassol J
Int J Cancer; 2013 Mar; 132(5):1105-13. PubMed ID: 22886747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Autoantibodies in breast cancer: their use as an aid to early diagnosis.
Chapman C; Murray A; Chakrabarti J; Thorpe A; Woolston C; Sahin U; Barnes A; Robertson J
Ann Oncol; 2007 May; 18(5):868-73. PubMed ID: 17347129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Serum autoantibody signature of ductal carcinoma in situ progression to invasive breast cancer.
Mangé A; Lacombe J; Bascoul-Mollevi C; Jarlier M; Lamy PJ; Rouanet P; Maudelonde T; Solassol J
Clin Cancer Res; 2012 Apr; 18(7):1992-2000. PubMed ID: 22322670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Serum autoantibodies profiling and early-stage cancer detection].
Desmetz C; Lacombe J; Mange A; Maudelonde T; Solassol J
Med Sci (Paris); 2011; 27(6-7):633-8. PubMed ID: 21718648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ with mammography, breast specific gamma imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study.
Brem RF; Fishman M; Rapelyea JA
Acad Radiol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):945-50. PubMed ID: 17659240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [MRI outstands mammogram in sensitivity of breast ductal carcinoma in situ:an analysis of 122 cases].
Yu QX; Chen XS; Wu JY; Han BS; He JR; Zhu L; Chen WG; Li YF; Tan L; Chai WM; Wang DB; Fei XC; Yuan F; Jin XL; Shen KW; Li HW
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 51(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 23578423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characteristics and behaviour of screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison with symptomatic patients.
Koh VC; Lim JC; Thike AA; Cheok PY; Thu MM; Tan VK; Tan BK; Ong KW; Ho GH; Tan WJ; Tan Y; Salahuddin AS; Busmanis I; Chong AP; Iqbal J; Thilagaratnam S; Wong JS; Tan PH
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Jul; 152(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 26077641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study.
Kuhl CK; Schrading S; Bieling HB; Wardelmann E; Leutner CC; Koenig R; Kuhn W; Schild HH
Lancet; 2007 Aug; 370(9586):485-92. PubMed ID: 17693177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Potential impact of USPSTF recommendations on early diagnosis of breast cancer.
Aragon R; Morgan J; Wong JH; Lum S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3137-42. PubMed ID: 21947591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative MRI of pure intraductal breast carcinoma--a valuable adjunct to mammography in assessing cancer extent.
Santamaría G; Velasco M; Farrús B; Zanón G; Fernández PL
Breast; 2008 Apr; 17(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 17964786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative effectiveness of incorporating a hypothetical DCIS prognostic marker into breast cancer screening.
Trentham-Dietz A; Ergun MA; Alagoz O; Stout NK; Gangnon RE; Hampton JM; Dittus K; James TA; Vacek PM; Herschorn SD; Burnside ES; Tosteson ANA; Weaver DL; Sprague BL
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Feb; 168(1):229-239. PubMed ID: 29185118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Newstead GM
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2010 May; 18(2):225-40, viii. PubMed ID: 20494308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pathological and biological differences between screen-detected and interval ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
de Roos MA; van der Vegt B; de Vries J; Wesseling J; de Bock GH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Jul; 14(7):2097-104. PubMed ID: 17453296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pathologic findings from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: population-based outcomes in women undergoing biopsy after screening mammography.
Weaver DL; Rosenberg RD; Barlow WE; Ichikawa L; Carney PA; Kerlikowske K; Buist DS; Geller BM; Key CR; Maygarden SJ; Ballard-Barbash R
Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):732-42. PubMed ID: 16411214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast scintigraphy with breast-specific γ-camera in the detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: a correlation with mammography and histologic subtype.
Spanu A; Sanna D; Chessa F; Cottu P; Manca A; Madeddu G
J Nucl Med; 2012 Oct; 53(10):1528-33. PubMed ID: 22911882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictors of invasive breast cancer in mammographically detected microcalcification in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia, atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ and recommendations for a selective approach to sentinel lymph node biopsy.
Catteau X; Simon P; Noël JC
Pathol Res Pract; 2012 Apr; 208(4):217-20. PubMed ID: 22445178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Menell JH; Morris EA; Dershaw DD; Abramson AF; Brogi E; Liberman L
Breast J; 2005; 11(6):382-90. PubMed ID: 16297080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]