280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24958249)
1. Pediatric video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscope: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Sun Y; Lu Y; Huang Y; Jiang H
Paediatr Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 24(10):1056-65. PubMed ID: 24958249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective model-based comparison of different laryngoscopes for difficult intubation in infants.
Kalbhenn J; Boelke AK; Steinmann D
Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Aug; 22(8):776-80. PubMed ID: 22646973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Truview PCD™ and the GlideScope(®) video laryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy in pediatric patients: a randomized trial.
Riveros R; Sung W; Sessler DI; Sanchez IP; Mendoza ML; Mascha EJ; Niezgoda J
Can J Anaesth; 2013 May; 60(5):450-7. PubMed ID: 23435693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the STORZ video laryngoscope and standard direct laryngoscopy for intubation in the Pediatric airway--a randomized clinical trial.
Vlatten A; Aucoin S; Litz S; Macmanus B; Soder C
Paediatr Anaesth; 2009 Nov; 19(11):1102-7. PubMed ID: 19708910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized controlled comparison of the Bonfils fiberscope and the GlideScope Cobalt AVL video laryngoscope for visualization of the larynx and intubation of the trachea in infants and small children with normal airways.
Kaufmann J; Laschat M; Hellmich M; Wappler F
Paediatr Anaesth; 2013 Oct; 23(10):913-9. PubMed ID: 23506414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of video laryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.
Su YC; Chen CC; Lee YK; Lee JY; Lin KJ
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Nov; 28(11):788-95. PubMed ID: 21897263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways.
van Zundert A; Maassen R; Lee R; Willems R; Timmerman M; Siemonsma M; Buise M; Wiepking M
Anesth Analg; 2009 Sep; 109(3):825-31. PubMed ID: 19690253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Efficacy of Glidescope video laryngoscope in difficult airways: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials].
Hirabayashi Y; Hoshijima H; Kuratani N
Masui; 2013 Aug; 62(8):996-1002. PubMed ID: 23984585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Efficacy of videolaryngoscopes for nasotracheal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials].
Hirabayashi Y; Hoshijima H; Kuratani N; Masaki E
Masui; 2013 Nov; 62(11):1375-9. PubMed ID: 24364283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is dexmedetomidine superior to midazolam as a premedication in children? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Sun Y; Lu Y; Huang Y; Jiang H
Paediatr Anaesth; 2014 Aug; 24(8):863-74. PubMed ID: 24666837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of different video laryngoscopes for emergency intubation in a standardized airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by experienced anaesthetists. A randomized, controlled crossover trial.
Wetsch WA; Spelten O; Hellmich M; Carlitscheck M; Padosch SA; Lier H; Böttiger BW; Hinkelbein J
Resuscitation; 2012 Jun; 83(6):740-5. PubMed ID: 22155448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope.
Serocki G; Bein B; Scholz J; Dörges V
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jan; 27(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 19809328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy and safety of videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in paediatric intubation: A meta-analysis of 27 randomized controlled trials.
Hu X; Jin Y; Li J; Xin J; Yang Z
J Clin Anesth; 2020 Nov; 66():109968. PubMed ID: 32645564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Bullard and Airtraq laryngoscopes with conventional laryngoscopy in a manikin study of simulated difficult intubation.
Legrand MA; Steinmann D; Priebe HJ; Mols G
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Jul; 29(7):343-50. PubMed ID: 22569030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Success rates and endotracheal tube insertion times of experienced emergency physicians using five video laryngoscopes: a randomised trial in a simulated trapped car accident victim.
Wetsch WA; Carlitscheck M; Spelten O; Teschendorf P; Hellmich M; Genzwürker HV; Hinkelbein J
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Dec; 28(12):849-58. PubMed ID: 21986981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: the Macintosh laryngoscope blade reduces, but does not replace, routine stylet use for intubation in morbidly obese patients.
Maassen R; Lee R; Hermans B; Marcus M; van Zundert A
Anesth Analg; 2009 Nov; 109(5):1560-5. PubMed ID: 19713258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway.
Aziz MF; Dillman D; Fu R; Brambrink AM
Anesthesiology; 2012 Mar; 116(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 22261795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [GlideScope AVL single-use video laryngoscope].
Hirabayashi Y
Masui; 2013 Sep; 62(9):1139-42. PubMed ID: 24063145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Glidescope® video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Griesdale DE; Liu D; McKinney J; Choi PT
Can J Anaesth; 2012 Jan; 59(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 22042705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Alternative intubation techniques vs Macintosh laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spine immobilization: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Suppan L; Tramèr MR; Niquille M; Grosgurin O; Marti C
Br J Anaesth; 2016 Jan; 116(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 26133898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
