179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24958640)
1. Benefit finding in adult cancer populations: psychometric properties and performance of existing instruments.
Pascoe L; Edvardsson D
Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2014 Oct; 18(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 24958640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Psychometric properties and performance of the 17-item Benefit Finding Scale (BFS) in an outpatient population of men with prostate cancer.
Pascoe L; Edvardsson D
Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2015 Apr; 19(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 25456974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychometric properties and performance of existing self-efficacy instruments in cancer populations: a systematic review.
Huang FF; Yang Q; Wang AN; Zhang JP
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Dec; 16(1):241. PubMed ID: 30591047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability, validity and feasibility of quality of life instruments for adult patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy: result from a systematic review.
Yip WK; Mordiffi SZ; Ang E
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2012 Mar; 10(1):27-52. PubMed ID: 22405415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of a social inclusion index to capture subjective and objective life domains (Phase II): psychometric development study.
Huxley P; Evans S; Madge S; Webber M; Burchardt T; McDaid D; Knapp M
Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(1):iii-vii, ix-xii, -1-241. PubMed ID: 22260923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and validity of the PORPUS, a combined psychometric and utility-based quality-of-life instrument for prostate cancer.
Ritvo P; Irvine J; Naglie G; Tomlinson G; Bezjak A; Matthew A; Trachtenberg J; Krahn M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 May; 58(5):466-74. PubMed ID: 15845333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic review of meaning in life assessment instruments.
Brandstätter M; Baumann U; Borasio GD; Fegg MJ
Psychooncology; 2012 Oct; 21(10):1034-52. PubMed ID: 22232017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of an instrument to measure self-efficacy in caregivers of people with advanced cancer.
Ugalde A; Krishnasamy M; Schofield P
Psychooncology; 2013 Jun; 22(6):1428-34. PubMed ID: 22941754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Demonstrating the psychometric properties of a problem-related distress screener in a community sample of 319 cancer survivors.
Miller MF; Buzaglo JS; Clark KL; Loscalzo MJ; Kennedy V; Taylor J; Dougherty KR; Golant M
Psychooncology; 2013 Jun; 22(6):1249-57. PubMed ID: 22736627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cancer patient experience measures: An evidence review.
Saunders C; Carter DJ; Jordan A; Duffield C; Bichel-Findlay J
J Psychosoc Oncol; 2016; 34(3):200-22. PubMed ID: 26983680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trust in Nurses Scale: construct validity and internal reliability evaluation.
Radwin LE; Cabral HJ
J Adv Nurs; 2010 Mar; 66(3):683-9. PubMed ID: 20423403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality of life measures for patients on hemodialysis: a review of psychometric properties.
Danquah FV; Wasserman J; Meininger J; Bergstrom N
Nephrol Nurs J; 2010; 37(3):255-69; quiz 270. PubMed ID: 20629464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychometric investigation of benefit finding among long-term cancer survivors using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.
Jones SM; Ziebell R; Walker R; Nekhlyudov L; Rabin BA; Nutt S; Fujii M; Chubak J
Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2016 Feb; 20():31-5. PubMed ID: 26220893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Caregiver burden in relatives of persons with schizophrenia: an overview of measure instruments].
Reine G; Lancon C; Simeoni MC; Duplan S; Auquier P
Encephale; 2003; 29(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 14567165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of a needs-based biopsychosocial distress instrument for cancer patients.
Lowery AE; Greenberg MA; Foster SL; Clark K; Casden DR; Loscalzo M; Bardwell WA
Psychooncology; 2012 Oct; 21(10):1099-106. PubMed ID: 21830256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Initial validation of the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer (Mini-MAC) scale: study of Portuguese end-of-life cancer patients.
Pereira FM; Santos CS
Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2014 Oct; 18(5):534-9. PubMed ID: 24882368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benefit finding in cancer: a review of influencing factors and health outcomes.
Pascoe L; Edvardsson D
Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2013 Dec; 17(6):760-6. PubMed ID: 23615709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring quality of life in cancer survivors: a methodological review of existing scales.
Pearce NJ; Sanson-Fisher R; Campbell HS
Psychooncology; 2008 Jul; 17(7):629-40. PubMed ID: 17973235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A review of instruments measuring resilience.
Ahern NR; Kiehl EM; Sole ML; Byers J
Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs; 2006; 29(2):103-25. PubMed ID: 16772239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Critical Review of Instruments Measuring the Quality of Life of Cancer Patients in Iranian Studies and Their Psychometrics Properties.
Hasanvand S; Rassouli M; Mandegari Z; Salmani N; Moghimkhan F
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Feb; 20(2):333-343. PubMed ID: 30803191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
