459 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24958689)
1. A randomized controlled three year evaluation of "bulk-filled" posterior resin restorations based on stress decreasing resin technology.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
Dent Mater; 2014 Sep; 30(9):e245-51. PubMed ID: 24958689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A 5-year randomized controlled clinical study.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
J Dent; 2016 Aug; 51():29-35. PubMed ID: 27238052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized 3-year clinical evaluation of Class I and II posterior resin restorations placed with a bulk-fill resin composite and a one-step self-etching adhesive.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
J Adhes Dent; 2015 Feb; 17(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 25625133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bulk-filled posterior resin restorations based on stress-decreasing resin technology: a randomized, controlled 6-year evaluation.
van Dijken JWV; Pallesen U
Eur J Oral Sci; 2017 Aug; 125(4):303-309. PubMed ID: 28524243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized controlled 30 years follow up of three conventional resin composites in Class II restorations.
Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
Dent Mater; 2015 Oct; 31(10):1232-44. PubMed ID: 26321155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite.
van Dijken JW; Lindberg A
Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 26205382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Durability of a low shrinkage TEGDMA/HEMA-free resin composite system in Class II restorations. A 6-year follow up.
van Dijken JWV; Pallesen U
Dent Mater; 2017 Aug; 33(8):944-953. PubMed ID: 28545657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-year clinical evaluation of class II posterior composite restorations placed with different techniques and flowable composite linings in endodontically treated teeth.
Karaman E; Keskin B; Inan U
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):709-716. PubMed ID: 27538739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized controlled evaluation of posterior resin restorations of an altered resin modified glass-ionomer cement with claimed bioactivity.
van Dijken JWV; Pallesen U; Benetti A
Dent Mater; 2019 Feb; 35(2):335-343. PubMed ID: 30527586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A 6-year prospective evaluation of a one-step HEMA-free self-etching adhesive in Class II restorations.
van Dijken JW
Dent Mater; 2013 Nov; 29(11):1116-22. PubMed ID: 24011496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized controlled 27 years follow up of three resin composites in Class II restorations.
Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1547-58. PubMed ID: 26363442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Eight-year randomized clinical evaluation of Class II nanohybrid resin composite restorations bonded with a one-step self-etch or a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jul; 19(6):1371-9. PubMed ID: 25359327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bulk fill restoratives: to cap or not to cap--that is the question?
Tomaszewska IM; Kearns JO; Ilie N; Fleming GJ
J Dent; 2015 Mar; 43(3):309-16. PubMed ID: 25625673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Flowable Bulk-fill Base on the Fracture Resistance of Class II Restorations: An Original Laboratory Experimental Study.
Al-Nahedh HN
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Apr; 22(4):342-348. PubMed ID: 34267000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.
Balkaya H; Arslan S; Pala K
J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180678. PubMed ID: 31596369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 5-year clinical performance of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Loguercio AD; Ñaupari-Villasante R; Gutierrez MF; Gonzalez MI; Reis A; Heintze SD
Dent Mater; 2023 Dec; 39(12):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 37839995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of the bulk fill composite QuiXfil in molar class I and II cavities: 10-year results of a RCT.
Heck K; Manhart J; Hickel R; Diegritz C
Dent Mater; 2018 Jun; 34(6):e138-e147. PubMed ID: 29636239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
