These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

460 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24958689)

  • 41. A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of one nano-hybrid and one high-viscosity bulk-fill composite restorative systems in class II cavities: 12 months results.
    Colak H; Tokay U; Uzgur R; Hamidi MM; Ercan E
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Jul; 20(7):822-831. PubMed ID: 28791976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. One-year evaluation of two hybrid composites placed in a randomized-controlled clinical trial.
    Beck F; Dumitrescu N; König F; Graf A; Bauer P; Sperr W; Moritz A; Schedle A
    Dent Mater; 2014 Aug; 30(8):824-38. PubMed ID: 24946982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Three-year Randomized Clinical Study of a One-step Universal Adhesive and a Two-step Self-etch Adhesive in Class II Composite Restorations.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    J Adhes Dent; 2017; 19(4):287-294. PubMed ID: 28849796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effects of application method on shrinkage vectors and volumetric shrinkage of bulk-fill composites in class-II restorations.
    Kaisarly D; Langenegger R; Litzenburger F; Heck K; El Gezawi M; Rösch P; Kunzelmann KH
    Dent Mater; 2022 Jan; 38(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 34836696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with bulk-fill flowable resin-based composite base materials.
    Moorthy A; Hogg CH; Dowling AH; Grufferty BF; Benetti AR; Fleming GJ
    J Dent; 2012 Jun; 40(6):500-5. PubMed ID: 22390980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Two-year clinical performance of sonic-resin placement system in posterior restorations.
    Atabek D; Aktaş N; Sakaryali D; Bani M
    Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(9):743-751. PubMed ID: 28849804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Fracture Resistance and Marginal Adaptation of Capped and Uncapped Bulk-fill Resin-based Materials.
    Al-Nahedh HN; Alawami Z
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(2):E43-E56. PubMed ID: 31750801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The effect of gingival wall location on the marginal seal of class ii restorations prepared with a flowable bulk-fill resin-based composite.
    Segal P; Candotto V; Ben-Amar A; Eger M; Matalon S; Lauritano D; Ormianer Z
    J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2018; 32(2 Suppl. 1):11-18. PubMed ID: 29460513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin composites in Class I restorations: three-year results of a randomized, double-blind and controlled clinical trial.
    Shi L; Wang X; Zhao Q; Zhang Y; Zhang L; Ren Y; Chen Z
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 20166406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparative evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive in class II bulk-fill restorations: A 48-month randomized controlled trial.
    Yazici AR; Uslu Tekce A; Kutuk ZB
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103921. PubMed ID: 34896442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Does a Self-adhesive Flowable Resin Composite Perform Similarly to Highly Filled and Conventional Flowable Resin Composites in Occlusal Cavities? A 2-year Follow-up Study.
    Oz FD; Meral E; Gurgan S
    J Adhes Dent; 2021 Dec; 23(6):497-503. PubMed ID: 34817965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Three-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial of the posterior composite QuiXfil in class I and II cavities.
    Manhart J; Chen HY; Hickel R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2009 Sep; 13(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 18998173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Clinical Evaluation of Sonic-Activated High Viscosity Bulk-Fill Nanohybrid Resin Composite Restorations in Class II Cavities: A Prospective Clinical Study up to 2 Years.
    Akalιn TT; Bozkurt FO; Kusdemir M; Özsoy A; Özcan M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Aug; 26(3):152-160. PubMed ID: 30063305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Thirty-Six-Month Clinical Comparison of Bulk Fill and Nanofill Composite Restorations.
    Yazici AR; Antonson SA; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(5):478-485. PubMed ID: 28581919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of microhybrid, packable and nanofilled resin composites in Class I restorations.
    Sadeghi M; Lynch CD; Shahamat N
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 20202097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. One-year Clinical Performance of Flowable Bulk-fill Composite vs Conventional Compomer Restorations in Primary Molars.
    Ehlers V; Gran K; Callaway A; Azrak B; Ernst CP
    J Adhes Dent; 2019; 21(3):247-254. PubMed ID: 31093618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A 3-year retrospective study of clinical durability of bulk-filled resin composite restorations.
    Ugurlu M; Sari F
    Restor Dent Endod; 2022 Feb; 47(1):e5. PubMed ID: 35284329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A four-year clinical evaluation of a highly filled hybrid resin composite in posterior cavities.
    Van Dijken JW; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K
    J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(4):343-9. PubMed ID: 16430017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations.
    Kiremitci A; Alpaslan T; Gurgan S
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 19192832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.