These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
62. The effect of two composite placement techniques on fracture resistance of MOD restorations with various resin composites. Bonilla ED; Hayashi M; Pameijer CH; Le NV; Morrow BR; Garcia-Godoy F J Dent; 2020 Oct; 101():103348. PubMed ID: 32417397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Clinical performance of ormocer, nanofilled, and nanoceramic resin composites in Class I and Class II restorations: a three-year evaluation. Mahmoud SH; El-Embaby AE; AbdAllah AM Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 23614660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. The influence of different placement techniques on the clinical success of bulk-fill resin composites placed in Class II cavities: a 4-year randomized controlled clinical study. Çakır Kılınç NN; Demirbuğa S Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Feb; 27(2):541-557. PubMed ID: 36222961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. One-year clinical evaluation of different types of bulk-fill composites. Bayraktar Y; Ercan E; Hamidi MM; Çolak H J Investig Clin Dent; 2017 May; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 26800647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Clinical performance and SEM marginal quality of extended posterior resin composite restorations after 12 years. Frankenberger R; Reinelt C; Glatthöfer C; Krämer N Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):e217-e228. PubMed ID: 32451207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Veloso SRM; Lemos CAA; de Moraes SLD; do Egito Vasconcelos BC; Pellizzer EP; de Melo Monteiro GQ Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Jan; 23(1):221-233. PubMed ID: 29594349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Three-year clinical evaluation of a flowable and a hybrid resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions. Kubo S; Yokota H; Yokota H; Hayashi Y J Dent; 2010 Mar; 38(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 19840829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Clinical Performance of Short-fiber-reinforced Resin Composite Restorations vs Resin Composite Onlay Restorations in Complex Cavities of Molars (Randomized Clinical Trial). ElAziz RH; Mohammed MM; Gomaa HA J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Mar; 21(3):296-303. PubMed ID: 32434978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars. Eden E; Topaloglu-Ak A; Frencken JE; van't Hof M Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Marginal quality of posterior microhybrid resin composite restorations applied using two polymerisation protocols: 5-year randomised split mouth trial. Barabanti N; Gagliani M; Roulet JF; Testori T; Ozcan M; Cerutti A J Dent; 2013 May; 41(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 23454329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Thirty-six month clinical evaluation of a highly filled flowable composite for direct posterior restorations. Kitasako Y; Sadr A; Burrow MF; Tagami J Aust Dent J; 2016 Sep; 61(3):366-73. PubMed ID: 26573239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Studies on posterior composite resins with special reference to class II restorations. Lundin SA Swed Dent J Suppl; 1990; 73():1-41. PubMed ID: 2264013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Mechanical behavior of Class I cavities restored by different material combinations under loading and polymerization shrinkage stress. A 3D-FEA study. Ausiello PP; Ciaramella S; Lanzotti A; Ventre M; Borges AL; Tribst JP; Dal Piva A; Garcia-Godoy F Am J Dent; 2019 Apr; 32(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 31094138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations. Banomyong D; Messer H J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Evaluation of Post-Operative Sensitivity of Bulk Fill Resin Composite versus Nano Resin Composite: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study. Afifi SMH; Haridy MF; Farid MR Open Access Maced J Med Sci; 2019 Jul; 7(14):2335-2342. PubMed ID: 31592052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Influence of curing methods and matrix type on the marginal seal of class II resin-based composite restorations in vitro. Hofmann N; Hunecke A Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 16536200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Class II restorations with margins below the CEJ. Kanca J; Greitzer G J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 19508264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]