These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2495876)

  • 1. Strength retention of chromic gut and monofilament synthetic absorbable suture materials in joint tissues.
    Walton M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 May; (242):303-10. PubMed ID: 2495876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strength retention of chromic gut and synthetic absorbable sutures in a nonhealing synovial wound.
    Walton M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Jun; (267):294-8. PubMed ID: 1904335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats.
    Sanz LE; Patterson JA; Kamath R; Willett G; Ahmed SW; Butterfield AB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):418-22. PubMed ID: 3126470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breaking strength and diameter of absorbable sutures after in vivo exposure in the rat.
    Outlaw KK; Vela AR; O'Leary JP
    Am Surg; 1998 Apr; 64(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 9544148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vivo and in vitro degradation of monofilament absorbable sutures, PDS and Maxon.
    Metz SA; Chegini N; Masterson BJ
    Biomaterials; 1990 Jan; 11(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 2105750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture made from polytrimethylene carbonate.
    Katz AR; Mukherjee DP; Kaganov AL; Gordon S
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1985 Sep; 161(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 3898441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Experimental study in the urinary tract of a new smooth surface absorbable synthetic monofilament (author's transl)].
    Beurton D; Gonties D; Terdjman S; Abraham SH; Dana A
    J Urol (Paris); 1981; 87(5):295-303. PubMed ID: 6792291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Polydioxanone (PDS), a novel monofilament synthetic absorbable suture.
    Ray JA; Doddi N; Regula D; Williams JA; Melveger A
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Oct; 153(4):497-507. PubMed ID: 6792722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of effects of suture materials on wound healing in a rabbit pyeloplasty model.
    Wainstein M; Anderson J; Elder JS
    Urology; 1997 Feb; 49(2):261-4. PubMed ID: 9037292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical and handling properties of braided polyblend polyethylene sutures in comparison to braided polyester and monofilament polydioxanone sutures.
    Wüst DM; Meyer DC; Favre P; Gerber C
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1146-53. PubMed ID: 17084288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The resistance of absorbable sutures in fetal tissue and fluids.
    Aktuğ T
    Turk J Pediatr; 1989; 31(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 2518585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative study on biocompatibility and absorption times of three absorbable monofilament suture materials (Polydioxanone, Poliglecaprone 25, Glycomer 631).
    Molea G; Schonauer F; Bifulco G; D'Angelo D
    Br J Plast Surg; 2000 Mar; 53(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 10878837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laboratory and clinical evaluation of a new synthetic absorbable suture for ophthalmic surgery.
    Dunlap WA; Purnell WD; McPherson SD
    Adv Ophthalmol; 1976; 33():49-61. PubMed ID: 790910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In-vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl, Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS.
    Bourne RB; Bitar H; Andreae PR; Martin LM; Finlay JB; Marquis F
    Can J Surg; 1988 Jan; 31(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 2827875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The disintegration of absorbable suture materials on exposure to human digestive juices: an update.
    Tian F; Appert HE; Howard JM
    Am Surg; 1994 Apr; 60(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 8129252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative evaluation of stiffness of commercial suture materials.
    Chu CC; Kizil Z
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Mar; 168(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 2919353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Studies on the efficacy and safety of polydioxanone monofilament absorbable suture.
    Lerwick E
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1983 Jan; 156(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 6401197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of suture materials on healing skin wounds.
    Van Winkle W; Hastings JC; Barker E; Hines D; Nichols W
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jan; 140(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1108243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Knotting abilities of a new absorbable monofilament suture: poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl).
    Trimbos JB; Niggebrugge A; Trimbos R; Van Rijssel EJ
    Eur J Surg; 1995 May; 161(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 7662774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preclinical evaluation of PDS (polydioxanone) synthetic absorbable suture vs chromic surgical gut in urologic surgery.
    Cohen EL; Kirschenbaum A; Glenn JF
    Urology; 1987 Oct; 30(4):369-72. PubMed ID: 3116740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.