These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24959142)

  • 21. Selective modulations of attentional asymmetries after sleep deprivation.
    Schmitz R; Deliens G; Mary A; Urbain C; Peigneux P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Oct; 49(12):3351-60. PubMed ID: 21871469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pseudoneglect for the bisection of mental number lines.
    Loftus AM; Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Chapman HL; Bradshaw JL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):925-45. PubMed ID: 18780193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Meta-analysis of the visuospatial aftereffects of prism adaptation, with two novel experiments.
    McIntosh RD; Brown BMA; Young L
    Cortex; 2019 Feb; 111():256-273. PubMed ID: 30530268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. No Evidence of Perceptual Pseudoneglect in Alexithymia.
    Vicario CM; Martino G; Marcuzzo A; Craparo G
    Brain Sci; 2021 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 33804270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reading direction shifts visuospatial attention: an Interactive Account of attentional biases.
    Rinaldi L; Di Luca S; Henik A; Girelli L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():98-105. PubMed ID: 24968311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intra- and inter-task reliability of spatial attention measures in healthy older adults.
    Märker G; Learmonth G; Thut G; Harvey M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226424. PubMed ID: 31869372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Improved Accuracy on Lateralized Spatial Judgments in Healthy Aging.
    Williamson JB; Murphy A; Lamb DG; Schwartz Z; Szeles D; Harciarek M; Mańkowska A; Heilman KM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2019 Nov; 25(10):1044-1050. PubMed ID: 31543083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prism adaptation in the healthy brain: the shift in line bisection judgments is long lasting and fluctuates.
    Schintu S; Pisella L; Jacobs S; Salemme R; Reilly KT; Farnè A
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():165-70. PubMed ID: 24291512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Lateralized processing of false memories and pseudoneglect in aging.
    Schmitz R; Dehon H; Peigneux P
    Cortex; 2013 May; 49(5):1314-24. PubMed ID: 22818903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Differential shift in spatial bias over time depends on observers׳ initial bias: Observer subtypes, or regression to the mean?
    Newman DP; Loughnane GM; Abe R; Zoratti MT; Martins AC; van den Bogert PC; Kelly SP; O'Connell RG; Bellgrove MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Nov; 64():33-40. PubMed ID: 25234646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. What's in a line? Verbal, facial, and emotional influences on the line bisection task.
    Hatin B; Sykes Tottenham L
    Laterality; 2016; 21(4-6):689-708. PubMed ID: 26847405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A reassessment of the pseudoneglect effect: Attention allocation systems are selectively engaged by semantic and spatial processing.
    Gray OJ; McFarquhar M; Montaldi D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Feb; 47(2):223-237. PubMed ID: 33271044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prism adaptation magnitude has differential influences on perceptual versus manual responses.
    Striemer CL; Russell K; Nath P
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2761-72. PubMed ID: 27206500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hemispheric dominance for visuospatial attention does not predict the direction of pseudoneglect.
    Gerrits R; Verhelst H; Vingerhoets G
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Nov; 148():107634. PubMed ID: 32998020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Further to the right: Viewing distance modulates attentional asymmetries ('pseudoneglect') during visual exploration.
    Hartmann M; Sommer NR; Diana L; Müri RM; Eberhard-Moscicka AK
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Feb; 129():40-48. PubMed ID: 30471991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Line and word bisection in right-brain-damaged patients with left spatial neglect.
    Veronelli L; Vallar G; Marinelli CV; Primativo S; Arduino LS
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Jan; 232(1):133-46. PubMed ID: 24146192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Line bisection under an attentional gradient induced by simulated neglect in healthy subjects.
    Grewal P; Viswanathan J; Barton JJ; Lanyon LJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1190-201. PubMed ID: 22118912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Rightward shift in spatial awareness with declining alertness.
    Manly T; Dobler VB; Dodds CM; George MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(12):1721-8. PubMed ID: 16154447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Signatures of functional visuospatial asymmetries in early infancy.
    Nava E; de Hevia MD; Bulf H; Macchi Cassia V
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 Mar; 215():105326. PubMed ID: 34883319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Image of a line is not shrunk but neglected. Absence of crossover in unilateral spatial neglect.
    Ishiai S; Koyama Y; Nakano N; Seki K; Nishida Y; Hayashi K
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 14644110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.