138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2495966)
1. Sensory (VEP, BAEP, SEP) and motor-evoked potentials, liquoral and magnetic resonance findings in multiple sclerosis.
Rossini PM; Zarola F; Floris R; Bernardi G; Perretti A; Pelosi L; Caruso G; Caramia MD
Eur Neurol; 1989; 29(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 2495966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-clinical tests for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
Rossini PM; Caramia M; Lavaroni F; Spadaro M; Floris R; Tanfani G; Zarola F; Traversa R; Marciani MG; Bernardi G
Riv Neurol; 1987; 57(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 3629127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic investigations in MS: which is the most sensitive?
Sola P; Scarpa M; Faglioni P; Sorgato P; Merelli E
Acta Neurol Scand; 1989 Nov; 80(5):394-9. PubMed ID: 2511730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The diagnostic value of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography, multimodal evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid examination in multiple sclerosis].
Staffen W; Trinka E; Ladurner G
Nervenarzt; 1993 Apr; 64(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 8506010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Childhood multiple sclerosis (MS): multimodal evoked potentials (EP) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) comparative study.
Scaioli V; Rumi V; Cimino C; Angelini L
Neuropediatrics; 1991 Feb; 22(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 2038422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis: the relation to VEP, SEP and CSF immunoglobulins.
Sand T; Sjaastad O; Romslo I; Sulg I
J Neurol; 1990 Oct; 237(6):376-8. PubMed ID: 2277273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Magnetic stimulation motor evoked potential in multiple sclerosis. Comparison with visual evoked potentials, brain stem auditory evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials].
Cui L
Zhonghua Shen Jing Jing Shen Ke Za Zhi; 1992 Jun; 25(3):130-2, 189. PubMed ID: 1395937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative impact of paraclinical studies in establishing the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
Gilmore RL; Kasarskis EJ; Carr WA; Norvell E
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1989 Nov; 73(5):433-42. PubMed ID: 2479522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiple sclerosis. Magnetic resonance imaging, evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid analysis.
David P; Ristori GP; Elia M; Bartoli A; Ciervo A; Massaro AR; Carbone G
Acta Neurol (Napoli); 1990 Jun; 12(3):200-6. PubMed ID: 2403026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation between multimodal evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis.
Comi G; Martinelli V; Medaglini S; Locatelli T; Filippi M; Canal N; Triulzi F; Del Maschio A
J Neurol; 1989 Jan; 236(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 2915225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evoked potentials. With special reference to the diagnostic value in multiple sclerosis.
Kjaer M
Acta Neurol Scand; 1983 Feb; 67(2):67-89. PubMed ID: 6342329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis: progress or stagnation?].
Zakrzewska-Pniewska B
Przegl Lek; 2010; 67(9):729-31. PubMed ID: 21387814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multimodal evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis: a contribution to diagnosis and classification.
Cosi V; Citterio A; Battelli G; Bergamaschi R; Grampa G; Callieco R
Ital J Neurol Sci; 1987 Jun; Suppl 6():109-12. PubMed ID: 3654170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Brainstem impairment in multiple sclerosis: an assessment by multimodal evoked potentials.
Cosi V; Bergamaschi R; Citterio A; Callieco R
Ital J Neurol Sci; 1989 Apr; 10(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 2737861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic value of paraclinical tests in multiple sclerosis: relative sensitivities and specificities for reclassification according to the Poser committee criteria.
Beer S; Rösler KM; Hess CW
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1995 Aug; 59(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 7629529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evoked potentials in suspected multiple sclerosis: diagnostic value and prediction of clinical course.
Hume AL; Waxman SG
J Neurol Sci; 1988 Feb; 83(2-3):191-210. PubMed ID: 3128646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Visual, early auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis (917 cases)].
Fischer C; Mauguière F; Ibañez V; Courjon J
Rev Neurol (Paris); 1986; 142(5):517-23. PubMed ID: 3787054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are somatosensory evoked potentials of the tibial nerve the most sensitive test in diagnosing multiple sclerosis?
Djuric S; Djuric V; Zivkovic M; Milosevic V; Jolic M; Stamenovic J; Djordjevic G; Calixto M
Neurol India; 2010; 58(4):537-41. PubMed ID: 20739788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and other techniques in 39 multiple sclerosis patients.
Comi G; Canal N; Martinelli V; Medaglini S; Locatelli T; Triulzi F; Del Maschio A; Banfi G
Riv Neurol; 1987; 57(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 3629129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Paraclinical tests in multiple sclerosis. Clinical correlation and predictive value].
Iriarte J; de Castro P; Artieda J; Zubieta JL; Martínez-Lage JM
Neurologia; 1993 Feb; 8(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 8452688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
