These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24960478)

  • 1. Novel port placement and 5-mm instrumentation for robotic-assisted hysterectomy.
    Nezhat CH; Katz A; Dun EC; Kho KA; Wieser FA
    JSLS; 2014; 18(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 24960478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic.
    Gungor M; Kahraman K; Dursun P; Ozbasli E; Genim C
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 28429119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer - complications, women´s experiences, quality of life and a health economic evaluation.
    Herling SF
    Dan Med J; 2016 Jul; 63(7):. PubMed ID: 27399986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments and glove port technique in gynecology: a single surgeon's experience.
    Yang YS; Oh KY; Hur MH; Kim SY; Yim HS
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 25051536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Nawfal AK; Orady M; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surgical outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy using three robotic arms versus conventional multiport laparoscopy in patients with cervical cancer.
    Yim GW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim HJ; Kim YT
    Yonsei Med J; 2014 Sep; 55(5):1222-30. PubMed ID: 25048478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
    Scheib SA; Fader AN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer.
    Herling SF; Møller AM; Palle C; Grynnerup A; Thomsen T
    Dan Med J; 2017 Mar; 64(3):. PubMed ID: 28260596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Initial experience with single-port robotic hysterectomy.
    Gomes MTV; Machado AMN; Podgaec S; Barison GAS
    Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2017; 15(4):476-480. PubMed ID: 29364368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes in women undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy at a tertiary hospital in Western Australia.
    Rajadurai VA; Tan J; Salfinger SG; Cohen PA
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Aug; 58(4):443-448. PubMed ID: 29168558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An analysis of the impact of previous laparoscopic hysterectomy experience on the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy.
    Eddib A; Jain N; Aalto M; Hughes S; Eswar A; Erk M; Michalik C; Krovi V; Singhal P
    J Robot Surg; 2013 Sep; 7(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 27000926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Novel Approach for 2-Port Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.
    Tyan P; Robinson J; Dandapani M; Li J; Gu A; Moawad GN
    Surg Innov; 2019 Aug; 26(4):442-448. PubMed ID: 30907239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.
    Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R
    Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does surgical platform impact recurrence and survival? A study of utilization of multiport, single-port, and robotic-assisted laparoscopy in endometrial cancer surgery.
    Chambers LM; Carr C; Freeman L; Jernigan AM; Michener CM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):243.e1-243.e11. PubMed ID: 31075245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost variance across obesity class for women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy by high-volume gynecologic surgeons.
    Klebanoff JS; Tyan P; Nishikawa M; North A; Amdur R; Sparks A; Kazma JM; Moawad GN
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Dec; 14(6):903-907. PubMed ID: 32253574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complications in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery according to case type: a 6-year retrospective cohort study using Clavien-Dindo classification.
    Wechter ME; Mohd J; Magrina JF; Cornella JL; Magtibay PM; Wilson JR; Kho RM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):844-50. PubMed ID: 24699301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus standard laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Winter ML; Leu SY; Lagrew DC; Bustillo G
    J Robot Surg; 2015 Dec; 9(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 26530837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
    Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
    Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.