183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24960479)
1. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative outcomes in hysterectomy.
Vree FE; Cohen SL; Chavan N; Einarsson JI
JSLS; 2014; 18(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 24960479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient, surgeon, and hospital disparities associated with benign hysterectomy approach and perioperative complications.
Mehta A; Xu T; Hutfless S; Makary MA; Sinno AK; Tanner EJ; Stone RL; Wang K; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 216(5):497.e1-497.e10. PubMed ID: 28034651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.
Lim PC; Crane JT; English EJ; Farnam RW; Garza DM; Winter ML; Rozeboom JL
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 26952352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: What Have We Learned from a Decade?
Carbonnel M; Moawad GN; Tarazi MM; Revaux A; Kennel T; Favre-Inhofer A; Ayoubi JM
JSLS; 2021; 25(1):. PubMed ID: 33879990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus standard laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Winter ML; Leu SY; Lagrew DC; Bustillo G
J Robot Surg; 2015 Dec; 9(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 26530837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of Minimum-Volume Standards on Patient Outcomes and Surgical Practice Patterns for Hysterectomy.
Ruiz MP; Chen L; Hou JY; Tergas AI; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL; Wright JD
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 132(5):1229-1237. PubMed ID: 30303921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications-surgical volume matters: a retrospective cohort study comparing complications of robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomies.
Baracy MG; Martinez M; Hagglund K; Afzal F; Kulkarni S; Corey L; Aslam MF
J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1199-1207. PubMed ID: 34981444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advanced Training of Gynecologic Surgeons and Incidence of Intraoperative Complications after Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Study of More Than 2000 Cases at a Single Institution.
McDonnell RM; Hollingworth JL; Chivers P; Cohen PA; Salfinger SG
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):810-815. PubMed ID: 29253636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of surgeon and hospital volume for robot-assisted and laparoscopic benign hysterectomy in Sweden.
Brunes M; Forsgren C; Warnqvist A; Ek M; Johannesson U
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Sep; 100(9):1730-1739. PubMed ID: 33895985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors of 30-day readmission following hysterectomy for benign and malignant indications at a tertiary care academic medical center.
Lee MS; Venkatesh KK; Growdon WB; Ecker JL; York-Best CM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 May; 214(5):607.e1-607.e12. PubMed ID: 26704895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.
Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of Robotic Hysterectomy for Treatment of Benign Conditions: Influence of Patient Complexity.
Herrinton LJ; Raine-Bennett T; Liu L; Alexeeff SE; Ramos W; Suh-Burgmann B
Perm J; 2020; 24():. PubMed ID: 31905335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Comparison of Complications and Costs.
Ngan TYT; Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Tulandi T; Abenhaim HA
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Apr; 40(4):432-439. PubMed ID: 29032064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A comparative analysis of hysterectomies].
Aniuliene R; Varzgaliene L; Varzgalis M
Medicina (Kaunas); 2007; 43(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 17329946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.
Uccella S; Morosi C; Marconi N; Arrigo A; Gisone B; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Borghi C; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 28711761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trends in readmission rate by route of hysterectomy - a single-center experience.
Kreuninger JA; Cohen SL; Meurs EAIM; Cox M; Vitonis A; Jansen FW; Einarsson JI
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Mar; 97(3):285-293. PubMed ID: 29192965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A single-center study.
Oyama K; Kanno K; Kojima R; Shirane A; Yanai S; Ota Y; Andou M
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Feb; 45(2):405-411. PubMed ID: 30426602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost variance across obesity class for women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy by high-volume gynecologic surgeons.
Klebanoff JS; Tyan P; Nishikawa M; North A; Amdur R; Sparks A; Kazma JM; Moawad GN
J Robot Surg; 2020 Dec; 14(6):903-907. PubMed ID: 32253574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
