These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24961250)

  • 1. Perceptual merging contributes to cueing effects.
    Krüger HM; MacInnes WJ; Hunt AR
    J Vis; 2014 Jun; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 24961250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal ambiguity of onsets in a cueing task prevents facilitation but not inhibition of return.
    Malevich T; Ardasheva L; Krüger HM; MacInnes WJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):106-117. PubMed ID: 29075992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facilitation and inhibition arising from the exogenous orienting of covert attention depends on the temporal properties of spatial cues and targets.
    Maruff P; Yucel M; Danckert J; Stuart G; Currie J
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(6):731-44. PubMed ID: 10390035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Probing the time course of facilitation and inhibition in gaze cueing of attention in an upper-limb reaching task.
    Yoxon E; Constable MD; Welsh TN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Oct; 81(7):2410-2423. PubMed ID: 31338823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of endogenous and exogenous attention on visual processing: an Inhibition of Return study.
    Chica AB; Lupiáñez J
    Brain Res; 2009 Jun; 1278():75-85. PubMed ID: 19374885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. No supplementary evidence of attention to a spatial cue when saccadic facilitation is absent.
    MacInnes WJ; Bhatnagar R
    Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):13289. PubMed ID: 30185930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do peripheral non-informative cues induce early facilitation of target detection?
    Tassinari G; Aglioti S; Chelazzi L; Peru A; Berlucchi G
    Vision Res; 1994 Jan; 34(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 8116277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vertical asymmetries and inhibition of return: effects of spatial and non-spatial cueing on behavior and visual ERPs.
    Gutiérrez-Domínguez FJ; Pazo-Álvarez P; Doallo S; Fuentes LJ; Lorenzo-López L; Amenedo E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Feb; 91(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 24342058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of central and peripheral cueing on perceptual and saccade performance.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Vision Res; 2018 Feb; 143():26-33. PubMed ID: 29262304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-modal cueing in audiovisual spatial attention.
    Blurton SP; Greenlee MW; Gondan M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2356-76. PubMed ID: 26001381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attention-shift vs. response-priming explanations for the spatial cueing effect in cross-modal tasks.
    Paavilainen P; Illi J; Moisseinen N; Niinisalo M; Ojala K; Reinikainen J; Vainio L
    Scand J Psychol; 2016 Jun; 57(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 26926651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Disentangling perceptual and motor components in inhibition of return.
    Zhou B
    Cogn Process; 2008 Aug; 9(3):175-87. PubMed ID: 18327623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection costs and contingent attentional capture.
    Schönhammer JG; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):429-437. PubMed ID: 27896707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decoding attention control and selection in visual spatial attention.
    Hong X; Bo K; Meyyappan S; Tong S; Ding M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Oct; 41(14):3900-3921. PubMed ID: 32542852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
    Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bias-free double judgment accuracy during spatial attention cueing: performance enhancement from voluntary and involuntary attention.
    Pack W; Klein SA; Carney T
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():204-12. PubMed ID: 25159288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of cueing on attentional focus in perceptual decision making.
    Yang CT; Little DR; Hsu CC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2256-75. PubMed ID: 24939235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial and temporal effects of spatial attention on human saccadic eye movements.
    Crawford TJ; Muller HJ
    Vision Res; 1992 Feb; 32(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 1574846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.