These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24961686)

  • 1. Effect of head diameter on passive and active dynamic hip dislocation.
    Bunn A; Colwell CW; D'Lima DD
    J Orthop Res; 2014 Nov; 32(11):1525-31. PubMed ID: 24961686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement.
    Kluess D; Martin H; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 May; 29(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 16901743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effect Of Increasing Femoral Head Size On The Force Required For Dislocation.
    Dietz MJ; Moushmoush O; Samora WP; Kish VL; Hamlin BR
    Surg Technol Int; 2019 Nov; 35():426-429. PubMed ID: 31282981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint.
    Bartz RL; Nobel PC; Kadakia NR; Tullos HS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Sep; 82(9):1300-7. PubMed ID: 11005521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter.
    Kluess D; Zietz C; Lindner T; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):748-54. PubMed ID: 19085490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty with 36 and 40-mm femoral heads.
    Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():153-5. PubMed ID: 17006370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Method for the evaluation of factors influencing the dislocation stability of total hip endoprotheses].
    Bader R; Scholz R; Steinhauser E; Busch R; Mittelmeier W
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 May; 49(5):137-44. PubMed ID: 15212199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decreased dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty using larger femoral head size and posterior capsular repair.
    Hummel MT; Malkani AL; Yakkanti MR; Baker DL
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):73-6. PubMed ID: 19577890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the permanent hip-stabilizing effect of atmospheric pressure.
    Prietzel T; Hammer N; Schleifenbaum S; Kaßebaum E; Farag M; von Salis-Soglio G
    J Biomech; 2014 Aug; 47(11):2660-5. PubMed ID: 24938930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dislocation rate after hip arthroplasty within the first postoperative year: 36 mm versus 28 mm femoral heads.
    Bistolfi A; Crova M; Rosso F; Titolo P; Ventura S; Massazza G
    Hip Int; 2011; 21(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 21948039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of total hip design on dislocation: a computer model and clinical analysis.
    Padgett DE; Lipman J; Robie B; Nestor BJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Jun; 447():48-52. PubMed ID: 16741474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Large-diameter femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty: an evidence-based review.
    Banerjee S; Pivec R; Issa K; Kapadia BH; Khanuja HS; Mont MA
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2014 Nov; 43(11):506-12. PubMed ID: 25379747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion.
    Girard J; Krantz N; Bocquet D; Wavreille G; Migaud H
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Feb; 27(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 21925779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Femoral head diameter considerations for primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Girard J
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Feb; 101(1 Suppl):S25-9. PubMed ID: 25596984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relative head size increase using an anatomic dual mobility hip prosthesis compared to traditional hip arthroplasty: impact on hip stability.
    D'Apuzzo MR; Nevelos J; Yeager A; Westrich GH
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1854-6. PubMed ID: 24997653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of Acetabular Shell Position and Component Design on Hip Dynamic Dislocation.
    Higuera Rueda CA; Ferguson DF; Scholl L; Klika AK
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Apr; 34(4):766-771. PubMed ID: 30639282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does dual-mobility cup geometry affect posterior horizontal dislocation distance?
    Heffernan C; Banerjee S; Nevelos J; Macintyre J; Issa K; Markel DC; Mont MA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 May; 472(5):1535-44. PubMed ID: 24464508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dual mobility in total hip arthroplasty.
    Plummer DR; Haughom BD; Della Valle CJ
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2014 Jan; 45(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 24267202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Berry DJ; von Knoch M; Schleck CD; Harmsen WS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Nov; 87(11):2456-63. PubMed ID: 16264121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cup size and risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Peter R; Lübbeke A; Stern R; Hoffmeyer P
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1305-9. PubMed ID: 21414747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.