197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24961739)
1. Contributions of visual and proprioceptive information to travelled distance estimation during changing sensory congruencies.
Campos JL; Butler JS; Bülthoff HH
Exp Brain Res; 2014 Oct; 232(10):3277-89. PubMed ID: 24961739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multisensory integration in the estimation of walked distances.
Campos JL; Butler JS; Bülthoff HH
Exp Brain Res; 2012 May; 218(4):551-65. PubMed ID: 22411581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The brain weights body-based cues higher than vision when estimating walked distances.
Campos JL; Byrne P; Sun HJ
Eur J Neurosci; 2010 May; 31(10):1889-98. PubMed ID: 20584194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Integration of vestibular and proprioceptive signals for spatial updating.
Frissen I; Campos JL; Souman JL; Ernst MO
Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jul; 212(2):163-76. PubMed ID: 21590262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stimulus Onset Asynchrony Affects Weighting-related Event-related Spectral Power in Self-motion Perception.
Townsend B; Legere JK; von Mohrenschildt M; Shedden JM
J Cogn Neurosci; 2023 Jul; 35(7):1092-1107. PubMed ID: 37043240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Viewpoint oscillation improves the perception of distance travelled in static observers but not during treadmill walking.
Bossard M; Goulon C; Mestre D
Exp Brain Res; 2020 Apr; 238(4):1073-1083. PubMed ID: 32211928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proprioceptive Distance Cues Restore Perfect Size Constancy in Grasping, but Not Perception, When Vision Is Limited.
Chen J; Sperandio I; Goodale MA
Curr Biol; 2018 Mar; 28(6):927-932.e4. PubMed ID: 29502946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multisensory integration in the estimation of relative path length.
Sun HJ; Campos JL; Chan GS
Exp Brain Res; 2004 Jan; 154(2):246-54. PubMed ID: 14685814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal visual-vestibular integration under conditions of conflicting intersensory motion profiles.
Butler JS; Campos JL; Bülthoff HH
Exp Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 233(2):587-97. PubMed ID: 25361642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Egocentric perception through interaction among many sensory systems.
Ohmi M
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1996 Dec; 5(1-2):87-96. PubMed ID: 9049074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Learned rather than online relative weighting of visual-proprioceptive sensory cues.
Mikula L; Gaveau V; Pisella L; Khan AZ; Blohm G
J Neurophysiol; 2018 May; 119(5):1981-1992. PubMed ID: 29465322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Path integration: effect of curved path complexity and sensory system on blindfolded walking.
Koutakis P; Mukherjee M; Vallabhajosula S; Blanke DJ; Stergiou N
Gait Posture; 2013 Feb; 37(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 22840893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Untangling visual and proprioceptive contributions to hand localisation over time.
Bellan V; Gilpin HR; Stanton TR; Newport R; Gallace A; Moseley GL
Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jun; 233(6):1689-701. PubMed ID: 25757958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability and relative weighting of visual and nonvisual information for perceiving direction of self-motion during walking.
Saunders JA
J Vis; 2014 Mar; 14(3):24. PubMed ID: 24648194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian integration of visual and vestibular signals for heading.
Butler JS; Smith ST; Campos JL; Bülthoff HH
J Vis; 2010 Sep; 10(11):23. PubMed ID: 20884518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multisensory integration in speed estimation during self-motion.
Sun HJ; Lee AJ; Campos JL; Chan GS; Zhang DH
Cyberpsychol Behav; 2003 Oct; 6(5):509-18. PubMed ID: 14583126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of visual and nonvisual sensory inputs to walked distance in a blind-walking task.
Ellard CG; Shaughnessy SC
Perception; 2003; 32(5):567-78. PubMed ID: 12854643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensory integration during reaching: the effects of manipulating visual target availability.
Khanafer S; Cressman EK
Exp Brain Res; 2014 Dec; 232(12):3833-46. PubMed ID: 25146571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Human postural responses to motion of real and virtual visual environments under different support base conditions.
Mergner T; Schweigart G; Maurer C; Blümle A
Exp Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 167(4):535-56. PubMed ID: 16132969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enhancement of visual cues to self-motion during a visual/vestibular conflict.
McManus M; Harris LR
PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0282975. PubMed ID: 36920954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
