These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24961990)

  • 1. Indirect genetic effects and inbreeding: consequences of BLUP selection for socially affected traits on rate of inbreeding.
    Khaw HL; Ponzoni RW; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jun; 46(1):39. PubMed ID: 24961990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mating structures for genomic selection breeding programs in aquaculture.
    Sonesson AK; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):46. PubMed ID: 27342705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
    Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
    Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Allele frequency changes due to hitch-hiking in genomic selection programs.
    Liu H; Sørensen AC; Meuwissen TH; Berg P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):8. PubMed ID: 24495634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes.
    Nielsen HM; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 21036937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selection on individual phenotype and best linear unbiased predictor of breeding value in a closed swine herd.
    Belonsky GM; Kennedy BW
    J Anim Sci; 1988 May; 66(5):1124-31. PubMed ID: 3397339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of index selection and best linear unbiased prediction for simulated layer poultry data.
    Jeyaruban MG; Gibson JP; Gowe RS
    Poult Sci; 1995 Oct; 74(10):1566-76. PubMed ID: 8559719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of culling on selection response using phenotypic selection or best linear unbiased prediction of breeding values in small, closed herds of swine.
    Kuhlers DL; Kennedy BW
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2338-48. PubMed ID: 1506297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic response and inbreeding with different selection methods and mating designs for nucleus breeding programs of dairy cattle.
    Leitch HW; Smith C; Burnside EB; Quinton M
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Jun; 77(6):1702-18. PubMed ID: 8083430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing genetic gain, inbreeding, and bias attributable to different flock genetic means in alternative sheep sire referencing schemes.
    Kuehn LA; Notter DR; Lewis RM
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(3):526-35. PubMed ID: 18073281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incidence of splayleg pigs in Nebraska litter size selection lines.
    Holl JW; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Jan; 83(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 15583040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficiency of genomic selection in a purebred pig male line.
    Tribout T; Larzul C; Phocas F
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4164-76. PubMed ID: 22859761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impacts of genotyping strategies on long-term genetic response in genomic selection.
    Nishio M; Satoh M
    Anim Sci J; 2014 May; 85(5):511-6. PubMed ID: 24506177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consequences of incorrect genetic parameter estimates for single-trait and multi-trait genetic evaluations in honeybees.
    Du M; Bernstein R; Hoppe A; Bienefeld K
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2022 Nov; 139(6):666-678. PubMed ID: 35775281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficient selection against categorically scored hip dysplasia in dogs is possible using best linear unbiased prediction and optimum contribution selection: a simulation study.
    Malm S; Sørensen AC; Fikse WF; Strandberg E
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2013 Apr; 130(2):154-64. PubMed ID: 23496016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple-trait breeding values for parental selection in self-pollinating crops.
    Bauer AM; Léon J
    Theor Appl Genet; 2008 Jan; 116(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 17955207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Broiler breeding strategies using indirect carcass measurements.
    Zerehdaran S; Vereijken AL; van Arendonk JA; Bovenhuis H; van der Waaij EH
    Poult Sci; 2005 Aug; 84(8):1214-21. PubMed ID: 16156205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genomic selection in dairy cattle simulated populations.
    Seno LO; Guidolin DGF; Aspilcueta-Borquis RR; Nascimento GBD; Silva TBRD; Oliveira HN; Munari DP
    J Dairy Res; 2018 May; 85(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 29785919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using recent versus complete pedigree data in genetic evaluation of a closed nucleus broiler line.
    Mehrabani-Yeganeh H; Gibson JP; Schaeffer LR
    Poult Sci; 1999 Jul; 78(7):937-41. PubMed ID: 10404672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic evaluation with major genes and polygenic inheritance when some animals are not genotyped using gene content multiple-trait BLUP.
    Legarra A; Vitezica ZG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Nov; 47():89. PubMed ID: 26576649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.