These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24961990)

  • 21. Prediction of rates of inbreeding in populations selected on best linear unbiased prediction of breeding value.
    Bijma P; Woolliams JA
    Genetics; 2000 Sep; 156(1):361-73. PubMed ID: 10978299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.
    Chiaia HLJ; Peripolli E; de Oliveira Silva RM; Feitosa FLB; de Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Olivieri BF; Espigolan R; Tonussi RL; Gordo DGM; de Albuquerque LG; de Oliveira HN; Ferrinho AM; Mueller LF; Kluska S; Tonhati H; Pereira ASC; Aguilar I; Baldi F
    J Appl Genet; 2018 Nov; 59(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 30251238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Marker assisted selection for the improvement of two antagonistic traits under mixed inheritance.
    Verrier E
    Genet Sel Evol; 2001; 33(1):17-38. PubMed ID: 11268312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Imputation of non-genotyped F1 dams to improve genetic gain in swine crossbreeding programs.
    See GM; Fix JS; Schwab CR; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2022 May; 100(5):. PubMed ID: 35451025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Marker-assisted selection can reduce true as well as pedigree-estimated inbreeding.
    Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC; Berg P
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2214-23. PubMed ID: 19389980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Economic aspects of implementing genomic evaluations in a pig sire line breeding scheme.
    Tribout T; Larzul C; Phocas F
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Oct; 45(1):40. PubMed ID: 24127883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Genomic prediction of survival time in a population of brown laying hens showing cannibalistic behavior.
    Alemu SW; Calus MP; Muir WM; Peeters K; Vereijken A; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Sep; 48(1):68. PubMed ID: 27623765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genetic selection strategies: computer modeling.
    Muir WM
    Poult Sci; 1997 Aug; 76(8):1066-70. PubMed ID: 9251130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Long-term response to genomic selection: effects of estimation method and reference population structure for different genetic architectures.
    Bastiaansen JW; Coster A; Calus MP; van Arendonk JA; Bovenhuis H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Jan; 44(1):3. PubMed ID: 22273519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of selection methods at the same level of inbreeding.
    Quinton M; Smith C; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Apr; 70(4):1060-7. PubMed ID: 1582935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of restricted maximum likelihood and method R for estimating heritability and predicting breeding value under selection.
    Cantet RJ; Birchmeier AN; Santos-Cristal MG; de Avila VS
    J Anim Sci; 2000 Oct; 78(10):2554-60. PubMed ID: 11048920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Two-stage selection strategies utilizing marker-quantitative trait locus information and individual performance.
    Gomez-Raya L; Klemetsdal G
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Aug; 77(8):2008-18. PubMed ID: 10461975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Response to selection while maximizing genetic variance in small populations.
    Cervantes I; Gutiérrez JP; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Sep; 48(1):69. PubMed ID: 27649906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genomic mating as sustainable breeding for Chinese indigenous Ningxiang pigs.
    He J; Wu XL; Zeng Q; Li H; Ma H; Jiang J; Rosa GJM; Gianola D; Tait RG; Bauck S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236629. PubMed ID: 32797113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding: overlapping generations.
    Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Oct; 76(10):2575-83. PubMed ID: 9814896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of using different culling regimens on genetic response with two-trait, two-stage selection in a nucleus broiler stock.
    Mehrabani-Yeganeh H; Gibson JP; Uimari P
    Poult Sci; 1999 Jul; 78(7):931-6. PubMed ID: 10404671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Predicting rates of inbreeding for livestock improvement schemes.
    Bijma P; Van Arendonk JA; Woolliams JA
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Apr; 79(4):840-53. PubMed ID: 11325188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Models with indirect genetic effects depending on group sizes: a simulation study assessing the precision of the estimates of the dilution parameter.
    Heidaritabar M; Bijma P; Janss L; Bortoluzzi C; Nielsen HM; Madsen P; Ask B; Christensen OF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 May; 51(1):24. PubMed ID: 31146682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A simulation study of a honeybee breeding scheme accounting for polyandry, direct and maternal effects on colony performance.
    Kistler T; Basso B; Phocas F
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Sep; 53(1):71. PubMed ID: 34496761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.