These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24962023)
21. Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening. Brandt KR; Scott CG; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Jensen MR; Whaley DH; Wu FF; Malkov S; Hruska CB; Norman AD; Heine J; Shepherd J; Pankratz VS; Kerlikowske K; Vachon CM Radiology; 2016 Jun; 279(3):710-9. PubMed ID: 26694052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Inter-observer agreement according to three methods of evaluating mammographic density and parenchymal pattern in a case control study: impact on relative risk of breast cancer. Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Diao P; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Vejborg I BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():274. PubMed ID: 25884160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Understanding Clinical Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: a Deep Learning Perspective. Mohamed AA; Luo Y; Peng H; Jankowitz RC; Wu S J Digit Imaging; 2018 Aug; 31(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 28932980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Computerized calculation of breast density: our experience from Arcadia Medical Imaging Center. Jari I; Ursaru M; Gheorghe L; Naum AG; Negru D Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2014; 118(4):979-85. PubMed ID: 25581957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of Visual Assessment of Breast Density in BI-RADS 4th and 5th Editions With Automated Volumetric Measurement. Youk JH; Kim SJ; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim JA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):703-708. PubMed ID: 28657850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Breast Density Estimation with Fully Automated Volumetric Method: Comparison to Radiologists' Assessment by BI-RADS Categories. Singh T; Sharma M; Singla V; Khandelwal N Acad Radiol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 26521687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories. Martin KE; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Paramagul C; Blane CE; Klein KA; Sonnad SS; Chan HP Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):656-65. PubMed ID: 16857974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validation of a new fully automated software for 2D digital mammographic breast density evaluation in predicting breast cancer risk. Giorgi Rossi P; Djuric O; Hélin V; Astley S; Mantellini P; Nitrosi A; Harkness EF; Gauthier E; Puliti D; Balleyguier C; Baron C; Gilbert FJ; Grivegnée A; Pattacini P; Michiels S; Delaloge S Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):19884. PubMed ID: 34615978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mammographic breast density: How it affects performance indicators in screening programmes? Posso M; Louro J; Sánchez M; Román M; Vidal C; Sala M; Baré M; Castells X; Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 110():81-87. PubMed ID: 30599878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Automated measurement of volumetric mammographic density: a tool for widespread breast cancer risk assessment. Brand JS; Czene K; Shepherd JA; Leifland K; Heddson B; Sundbom A; Eriksson M; Li J; Humphreys K; Hall P Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 Sep; 23(9):1764-72. PubMed ID: 25012995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of LIBRA Software for Fully Automated Mammographic Density Assessment in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction. Gastounioti A; Kasi CD; Scott CG; Brandt KR; Jensen MR; Hruska CB; Wu FF; Norman AD; Conant EF; Winham SJ; Kerlikowske K; Kontos D; Vachon CM Radiology; 2020 Jul; 296(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 32396041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. AutoDensity: an automated method to measure mammographic breast density that predicts breast cancer risk and screening outcomes. Nickson C; Arzhaeva Y; Aitken Z; Elgindy T; Buckley M; Li M; English DR; Kavanagh AM Breast Cancer Res; 2013; 15(5):R80. PubMed ID: 24020331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness threshold better predicts breast cancer risk for full-field digital mammograms. Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Yoon-Ho C; Jenkins MA; Sung J; Hopper JL; Song YM Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Nov; 17():142. PubMed ID: 26581435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Misclassification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Mammographic Density and Implications for Breast Density Reporting Legislation. Gard CC; Aiello Bowles EJ; Miglioretti DL; Taplin SH; Rutter CM Breast J; 2015; 21(5):481-9. PubMed ID: 26133090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Inter- and intraradiologist variability in the BI-RADS assessment and breast density categories for screening mammograms. Redondo A; Comas M; Macià F; Ferrer F; Murta-Nascimento C; Maristany MT; Molins E; Sala M; Castells X Br J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 85(1019):1465-70. PubMed ID: 22993385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Risk stratification of women with false-positive test results in mammography screening based on mammographic morphology and density: A case control study. Winkel RR; Euler-Chelpin MV; Lynge E; Diao P; Lillholm M; Kallenberg M; Forman JL; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Nielsen M; Vejborg I Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 49():53-60. PubMed ID: 28558329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer]. Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]