These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

477 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24962065)

  • 1. Genomic analysis of dominance effects on milk production and conformation traits in Fleckvieh cattle.
    Ertl J; Legarra A; Vitezica ZG; Varona L; Edel C; Emmerling R; Götz KU
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jun; 46(1):40. PubMed ID: 24962065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accounting for dominance to improve genomic evaluations of dairy cows for fertility and milk production traits.
    Aliloo H; Pryce JE; González-Recio O; Cocks BG; Hayes BJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Feb; 48():8. PubMed ID: 26830030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improvement of prediction ability for genomic selection of dairy cattle by including dominance effects.
    Sun C; VanRaden PM; Cole JB; O'Connell JR
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e103934. PubMed ID: 25084281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating dominance genetic variances for growth traits in American Angus males using genomic models.
    Garcia-Baccino CA; Lourenco DAL; Miller S; Cantet RJC; Vitezica ZG
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Jan; 98(1):. PubMed ID: 31867623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genomic prediction of milk-production traits and somatic cell score using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor with random regression test-day model in Thai dairy cattle.
    Buaban S; Prempree S; Sumreddee P; Duangjinda M; Masuda Y
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Dec; 104(12):12713-12723. PubMed ID: 34538484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimates of missing heritability for complex traits in Brown Swiss cattle.
    Román-Ponce SI; Samoré AB; Dolezal MA; Bagnato A; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jun; 46(1):36. PubMed ID: 24898214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of non-additive genetic effects on carcass and meat quality traits in Korean Hanwoo cattle using genomic models.
    Bhuiyan MSA; Kim YK; Lee DH; Chung Y; Lee DJ; Kang JM; Lee SH
    Animal; 2024 May; 18(5):101152. PubMed ID: 38701710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction accuracies and genetic parameters for test-day traits from genomic and pedigree-based random regression models with or without heat stress interactions.
    Bohlouli M; Alijani S; Naderi S; Yin T; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Jan; 102(1):488-502. PubMed ID: 30343923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic studies of milk-related traits in water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) based on single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction and random regression models.
    Lázaro SF; Tonhati H; Oliveira HR; Silva AA; Nascimento AV; Santos DJA; Stefani G; Brito LF
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5768-5793. PubMed ID: 33685677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The marker effects of a single-step random regression model for 4 test-day traits in German Holsteins.
    Alkhoder H; Liu Z; Reents R
    J Dairy Sci; 2024 Jan; 107(1):423-437. PubMed ID: 37709030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short communication: Single-step genomic evaluation of milk production traits using multiple-trait random regression model in Chinese Holsteins.
    Kang H; Ning C; Zhou L; Zhang S; Yan Q; Liu JF
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Dec; 101(12):11143-11149. PubMed ID: 30268613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of fitting dominance and additive effects on accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in layers.
    Heidaritabar M; Wolc A; Arango J; Zeng J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Bastiaansen JW; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Oct; 133(5):334-46. PubMed ID: 27357473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic prediction of lactation curves for milk, fat, protein, and somatic cell score in Holstein cattle.
    Oliveira HR; Brito LF; Silva FF; Lourenco DAL; Jamrozik J; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Jan; 102(1):452-463. PubMed ID: 30391177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of additive and non-additive genetic effects for fertility and reproduction traits in North American Holstein cattle using genomic information.
    Alves K; Brito LF; Baes CF; Sargolzaei M; Robinson JAB; Schenkel FS
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2020 May; 137(3):316-330. PubMed ID: 31912573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Including overseas performance information in genomic evaluations of Australian dairy cattle.
    Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Schrooten C; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 May; 98(5):3443-59. PubMed ID: 25771052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genomic evaluation of milk yield in a smallholder crossbred dairy production system in India.
    Al Kalaldeh M; Swaminathan M; Gaundare Y; Joshi S; Aliloo H; Strucken EM; Ducrocq V; Gibson JP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Sep; 53(1):73. PubMed ID: 34507523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genotype by environment (climate) interaction improves genomic prediction for production traits in US Holstein cattle.
    Tiezzi F; de Los Campos G; Parker Gaddis KL; Maltecca C
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Mar; 100(3):2042-2056. PubMed ID: 28109596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single-step genomic evaluation of milk production traits in Canadian Alpine and Saanen dairy goats.
    Massender E; Brito LF; Maignel L; Oliveira HR; Jafarikia M; Baes CF; Sullivan B; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Mar; 105(3):2393-2407. PubMed ID: 34998569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Novel use of derived genotype probabilities to discover significant dominance effects for milk production traits in dairy cattle.
    Boysen TJ; Heuer C; Tetens J; Reinhardt F; Thaller G
    Genetics; 2013 Feb; 193(2):431-42. PubMed ID: 23222654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.